Thrash et al v. Cirrus Enterprises, LLC et al
Filing
106
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 103 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Deposition of Rohr, Inc.'s 30(b)(6) witness filed by Rohr, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 13, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2018)
1
2
3
4
DAVID M. GLASPY, Esq. SBN 95332
DGlaspy@mgmlaw.com
MANION GAYNOR & MANNING LLP
One Walnut Creek Center
100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 750
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 947-1300
Facsimile: (925) 947-1594
5
Attorneys for ROHR, INC.
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSEPH THRASH, an individual; CHEZ
THRASH, an individual,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
vs.
Case No. 3:17-cv-01501-JST
Transferred from Alameda Superior
Court RG17850130
Assigned to Hon. Jon S. Tigar
CIRRUS ENTERPRISES LLC, et al.
Defendants.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITION
OF ROHR, INC.’S 30(b)(6) WITNESS
16
Initially filed: February 21, 2017
Trial date: May 29, 2018
17
18
19
Due to scheduling conflicts, Defendant Rohr, Inc. (“Rohr”) and Plaintiffs stipulate
20
that the deposition of Rohr’s 30(b)(6) witness can go forward after the discovery deadline
21
currently set in this matter.
22
Counsel for Rohr, Inc. represents that each defendant in this matter (Goodyear Tire
23
and Rubber Company (erroneously sued as successor-in-interest to Goodyear Aerospace);
24
Honeywell International, Inc.; The Boeing Company; Lockheed Martin Corporation;
25
Henkel Corporation; IMO Industries; and United Technologies Corporation) has been
26
made aware of this proposed stipulation and each has responded that it does not object.
27
28
The filing party attests that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing
is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITION OF ROHR, INC.’S 30 (b)(6) WITNESS
1
Dated: February 9, 2018
MANION GAYNOR & MANNING LLP
2
3
By:
/s/ David M. Glaspy
4
David M. Glaspy, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
ROHR, INC.
5
6
7
8
Dated: February 9, 2018
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
9
10
By:
11
/s/ Robert Green
Robert Green, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED
16
Dated: February 13, 2018
17
18
19
_____________________________
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITION OF ROHR, INC.’S 30 (b)(6) WITNESS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?