Thrash et al v. Cirrus Enterprises, LLC et al

Filing 106

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 103 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Deposition of Rohr, Inc.'s 30(b)(6) witness filed by Rohr, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 13, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 DAVID M. GLASPY, Esq. SBN 95332 DGlaspy@mgmlaw.com MANION GAYNOR & MANNING LLP One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 750 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 947-1300 Facsimile: (925) 947-1594 5 Attorneys for ROHR, INC. 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH THRASH, an individual; CHEZ THRASH, an individual, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 vs. Case No. 3:17-cv-01501-JST Transferred from Alameda Superior Court RG17850130 Assigned to Hon. Jon S. Tigar CIRRUS ENTERPRISES LLC, et al. Defendants. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITION OF ROHR, INC.’S 30(b)(6) WITNESS 16 Initially filed: February 21, 2017 Trial date: May 29, 2018 17 18 19 Due to scheduling conflicts, Defendant Rohr, Inc. (“Rohr”) and Plaintiffs stipulate 20 that the deposition of Rohr’s 30(b)(6) witness can go forward after the discovery deadline 21 currently set in this matter. 22 Counsel for Rohr, Inc. represents that each defendant in this matter (Goodyear Tire 23 and Rubber Company (erroneously sued as successor-in-interest to Goodyear Aerospace); 24 Honeywell International, Inc.; The Boeing Company; Lockheed Martin Corporation; 25 Henkel Corporation; IMO Industries; and United Technologies Corporation) has been 26 made aware of this proposed stipulation and each has responded that it does not object. 27 28 The filing party attests that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITION OF ROHR, INC.’S 30 (b)(6) WITNESS 1 Dated: February 9, 2018 MANION GAYNOR & MANNING LLP 2 3 By: /s/ David M. Glaspy 4 David M. Glaspy, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant ROHR, INC. 5 6 7 8 Dated: February 9, 2018 WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 9 10 By: 11 /s/ Robert Green Robert Green, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED 16 Dated: February 13, 2018 17 18 19 _____________________________ United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITION OF ROHR, INC.’S 30 (b)(6) WITNESS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?