Thrash et al v. Cirrus Enterprises, LLC et al

Filing 109

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 107 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE: DEPOSITIONS OF EXPERT WITNESSES filed by The Boeing Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 15, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Brent M. Karren (State Bar No. 291038)
[e-mail]
Dustin C. Beckley (State Bar No. 238692)
[e-mail]
MANION GAYNOR & MANNING LLP
444 South Flower Street, Suite 1550
Los Angeles , CA 90071
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
THE BOEING COMPANY, individually and as
successor by merger to McDONNELL DOUGLAS
CORPORATION, successor by merger with
DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT COMPANY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
LAW OFFICES OF
MANION GAYNOR & MANNING LLP

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13

JOSEPH THRASH and CHEZ THRASH,

14
15

Plaintiffs,
vs.

Case No. 3:17-cv-01501-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE: DEPOSITIONS OF EXPERT
WITNESSES

16
CIRRUS ENTERPRISES, LLC, et al.,
17
Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1845163v1

Case No. 3:17-cv-01501-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEPOSITIONS OF EXPERT WITNESSES

1
2

Plaintiffs and defendants hereby stipulate as follows and request that the Court approve the
parties’ stipulation regarding the depositions of expert witnesses:

3

1) Plaintiffs and defendants have stipulated that it is not necessary to subpoena the

4

opposing side’s expert witnesses in this case. Any party who wants to take any opposing

5

party’s expert deposition in person can do so near the expert’s location at the noticing

6

party’s expense.
2) Rather than having to serve a subpoena, a party may request dates of availability of an

8

opposing party’s experts, and, within 48 hours of such request, the opposing party will

9

provide dates of their experts’ availability for deposition. The requesting party may

10

subsequently serve a notice of deposition including requests for production of

11

documents at the deposition (subject to proper objections).

12
13

The filing party attests that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is
submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.

14
15
16

Dated: February 14, 2018

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

17

By:
//s// Robert Green
Robert Green, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiffs

18
19
Dated: February 14, 2018

21

ER

Ti ga r

1845163v1

R NIA

n S.
J u d ge J o

H

28

RT

27

NO

26

FO

25

ERED
O ORD
IT IS S

By:
//s// Dustin C. Beckley
Dustin C. Beckley, Esq.
Brent M. Karren , Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
THE BOEING COMPANY

LI

24

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

23

S

22

MANION GAYNOR & MANNING LLP

A

20

UNIT
ED

LAW OFFICES OF
MANION GAYNOR & MANNING LLP

7

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C February 15, 2018
1

Case No. 3:17-cv-01501-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEPOSITIONS OF EXPERT WITNESSES

1

Dated: February 14, 2018

GLAZIER YEE LLP
By:
//s// Deborah M. Parker
Deborah M. Parker, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

2
3
4
5
6
7

Dated: February 14, 2018

8

TUCKER ELLIS LLP
By:
//s// Lance Wilson
Lance Wilson, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

9
10

LAW OFFICES OF
MANION GAYNOR & MANNING LLP

11
12
13
14

Dated: February 14, 2018

15

GORDON & REES LLP
By:
//s// Michael J. Pietrykowski
Michael J. Pietrykowski, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER
COMPANY

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Dated: February 14, 2018

MANION GAYNOR & MANNING LLP
By:
//s// David Michael Glaspy
David Michael Glaspy, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
ROHR, INC.

26
27
28
-2Case No. 3:17-cv-01501-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEPOSITIONS OF EXPERT WITNESSES

1

Dated: February 14, 2018

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
By:
//s// Florence Anne McClain-Meza
Florence Anne McClain-Meza, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
HENKEL CORPORATION, individually and as
s-i-i to DEXTER CORP., DEXTER HYSOL
AEROSPACE LLC

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Dated: February 14, 2018

10

By:
//s// Bobbie Rae Bailey
Bobbie Rae Bailey, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
IMO Industries Inc.

11

LAW OFFICES OF
MANION GAYNOR & MANNING LLP

LEADER & BERKON LLP

12
13
14
15

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
Dated:
17
18

_____________________________
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3Case No. 3:17-cv-01501-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEPOSITIONS OF EXPERT WITNESSES