Parker v. City of Pittsburg et al

Filing 29

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 09/21/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Eugene B. Elliot, State Bar No. 111475 Nicole L. Phillips, State Bar No. 306686 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL The Waterfront Building 2749 Hyde Street San Francisco, California 94109 Telephone: (415) 353-0999 Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF PITTSBURG 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ALONZO PARKER, 12 13 Case No. 3:17-cv-01563-LB Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. 14 15 16 CITY OF PITTSBURG, PITTSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, and DOES 1 through 20, Defendants. Hon. Laurel Beeler 17 18 On July 13, 2017, the court granted the City of Pittsburg’s motion to dismiss the complaint for 19 failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 24.) The court gave 20 Mr. Parker 28 days to file an amended complaint, but he did not do so. On August 25, 2017, the court 21 further extended Mr. Parker’s time to file an amended complaint to Tuesday, September 12, 2017, but he 22 did not do so. (ECF No. 25.) Accordingly, the court hereby dismisses this case without prejudice. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 Dated: September 21, 2017 Laurel Beeler UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case No.: 3:17-cv-01563-LB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?