Parker v. City of Pittsburg et al

Filing 29

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 09/21/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2017)

1
2
3
4
5

Eugene B. Elliot, State Bar No. 111475
Nicole L. Phillips, State Bar No. 306686
BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL
The Waterfront Building
2749 Hyde Street
San Francisco, California 94109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7

Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF PITTSBURG

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

ALONZO PARKER,

12
13

Case No. 3:17-cv-01563-LB

Plaintiff,

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v.

14
15
16

CITY OF PITTSBURG, PITTSBURG POLICE
DEPARTMENT, and DOES 1 through 20,
Defendants.
Hon. Laurel Beeler

17
18

On July 13, 2017, the court granted the City of Pittsburg’s motion to dismiss the complaint for

19

failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 24.) The court gave

20

Mr. Parker 28 days to file an amended complaint, but he did not do so. On August 25, 2017, the court

21

further extended Mr. Parker’s time to file an amended complaint to Tuesday, September 12, 2017, but he

22

did not do so. (ECF No. 25.) Accordingly, the court hereby dismisses this case without prejudice.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26

Dated: September 21, 2017
Laurel Beeler
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Case No.: 3:17-cv-01563-LB