Khan v. Tillerman
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Case Management Statement due by 11/24/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/30/2017 10:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge James Donato on 9/13/2017. (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
CHAD A. READLER
Acting Assistant Attorney General
WILLIAM C. PEACHEY
Director
COLIN A. KISOR
Deputy Director
ADRIENNE ZACK (CA Bar No. 291629)
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division
Office of Immigration Litigation
District Court Section
P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0868
Telephone: (202) 598-2446
Facsimile: (202) 305-7000
adrienne.m.zack@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendant Rex Wayne Tillerson
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
SABIA KHAN,
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
16
REX WAYNE TILLERSON, United States
Secretary of State,
17
Defendant.
) Case No.: 3:17-cv-1658-JD
)
)
)
) [Proposed] Order
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
[Proposed] ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant
21
shall answer, plead, or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before October 30, 2017. IT IS
22
FURTHER ORDERED that the initial case management conference is continued to November
23
30, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. The related case management and ADR multi-option program deadlines
24
are also continued accordingly.
25
26
[Proposed] Order Extending Time
to Answer and Continuing
Case Management Conference
No. 4:17-cv-1658-JD
1
ED
V
APPRO
R NIA
S
UNIT
ED
Date: ____________________, 2017
September 13
RT
U
O
1
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
3
ER
The Honorable James Donato
C
N
F
DI T ICT
United StatesSDistrictOJudge
R
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
[Proposed] Order Extending Time
to Answer and Continuing
Case Management Conference
No. 4:17-cv-1658-JD
2
LI
H
5
A
RT
4
Ju
FO
ato
___________________________
es Don
dge Jam
NO
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?