State Bar of California v. Everett
Filing
60
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 12/11/2018)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA,
Plaintiff,
5
6
7
8
Case No. 18-cv-05879 SI
Case No. 17-cv-01716 SI
v.
DANIEL EVERETT,
Defendant.
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 6, 17
9
Before the Court are plaintiff’s Motion for Remand and Enforcement of Sanctions Order,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
filed on October 5, 2018 (Dkt. No. 6), and Administrative Motion to Stay Order on State Bar’s
12
Motion for Remand Pending Resolution of the State Bar’s Motion to Relate Cases (Dkt. No. 17).
13
This Court related the above-caption cases on December 11, 2018.
14
Administrative Motion to Stay is DENIED AS MOOT.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s
15
Regarding plaintiff’s Motion for Remand and Enforcement of Sanctions, which has been
16
pending for over two months already, defendant has served and filed an Opposition/Response (No.
17
18-5879, Doc. 19). In that filing, defendant also requests further time to respond. Since defendant’s
18
response is on file, he is not required to file anything further. Should he wish to, however, he is
19
given leave to file one further opposition, which must be filed on or before Wednesday, January
20
9, 2019. (This will result in defendant’s having had over three months to fashion a response.
21
Consequently, the Court does not anticipate receiving or granting any further extension of time to
22
defendant on this motion.)
23
The Plaintiff shall serve and file a reply, if any, on or before Wednesday, January 16, 2019.
24
Unless the Court orders otherwise, the matter shall be submitted for decision without oral argument.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 11, 2018
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?