State Bar of California v. Everett

Filing 60

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 12/11/2018)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, 5 6 7 8 Case No. 18-cv-05879 SI Case No. 17-cv-01716 SI v. DANIEL EVERETT, Defendant. ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Re: Dkt. Nos. 6, 17 9 Before the Court are plaintiff’s Motion for Remand and Enforcement of Sanctions Order, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 filed on October 5, 2018 (Dkt. No. 6), and Administrative Motion to Stay Order on State Bar’s 12 Motion for Remand Pending Resolution of the State Bar’s Motion to Relate Cases (Dkt. No. 17). 13 This Court related the above-caption cases on December 11, 2018. 14 Administrative Motion to Stay is DENIED AS MOOT. Accordingly, plaintiff’s 15 Regarding plaintiff’s Motion for Remand and Enforcement of Sanctions, which has been 16 pending for over two months already, defendant has served and filed an Opposition/Response (No. 17 18-5879, Doc. 19). In that filing, defendant also requests further time to respond. Since defendant’s 18 response is on file, he is not required to file anything further. Should he wish to, however, he is 19 given leave to file one further opposition, which must be filed on or before Wednesday, January 20 9, 2019. (This will result in defendant’s having had over three months to fashion a response. 21 Consequently, the Court does not anticipate receiving or granting any further extension of time to 22 defendant on this motion.) 23 The Plaintiff shall serve and file a reply, if any, on or before Wednesday, January 16, 2019. 24 Unless the Court orders otherwise, the matter shall be submitted for decision without oral argument. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 11, 2018 ______________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?