Board of Retirement of the Imperial County Employees' Retirement System v. Franklin Templeton Investor Services, LLC et al
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Second Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Date to Re-File Motion to Dismiss in Order to Finalize Pending Settlement filed by Franklin/Templeton Distributors, Inc., Templeton Institutional Funds, Inc., Franklin Templeton Investor Services, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 8, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
GILBERT R. SEROTA (No. 75305)
gilbert.serota@apks.com
ALISON C. EPSTEIN (No. 311081)
alison.epstein@apks.com
Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
Telephone:
415.471.3100
Facsimile:
415.471.3400
Attorneys for Defendants
Franklin Templeton Investor Services, LLC,
Franklin/Templeton Distributors, Inc., and Templeton
Institutional Funds
8
9
10
11
12
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
RAYMOND F. LYNCH, (No. 119065)
rlynch@hansonbridgett.com
MATTHEW J. PECK, (No. 287934)
mpeck@hansonbridgett.com
425 Market Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.777-3200
Facsimile:
415.541-9366
13
14
Attorneys for Board of Retirement of the Imperial
County Employees’ Retirement System
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
20
BOARD OF RETIREMENT OF THE
IMPERIAL COUNTY EMPLOYEES’
RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
21
Plaintiff,
22
v.
Case No. 3:17-cv-01784-JCS
SECOND STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
DATE TO RE-FILE MOTION TO
DISMISS IN ORDER TO FINALIZE
PENDING SETTLEMENT
23
24
25
FRANKLIN TEMPLETON INVESTOR
SERVICES, LLC, FRANKLIN/TEMPLETON
DISTRIBUTORS, INC., TEMPLETON
INSTITUTIONAL FUNDS, AND DOES 1
THROUGH 50,
Judge: The Hon. Jon S. Tigar
Courtroom: 9, 19th Floor
26
Defendants.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SECOND ORDER EXTENDING DATE TO RE-FILE MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 3:17-cv-01784-JCS
1
2
3
WHEREAS, on April 18, 2017, the above-captioned action was assigned to United States
District Judge Jon S. Tiger. ECF 15;
WHEREAS, by Stipulation on April 18, 2017, the parties requested that the Court extend
4
Defendants’ time to re-file their motion to dismiss the Complaint (“the Motion”), previously filed
5
before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero, in order to facilitate the parties’ settlement discussions;
6
7
WHEREAS, by Orders dated April 18, 2017 and April 25, 2017, this Court extended the
time for the parties to submit a schedule for re-filing the Motion and for briefing thereon to May 26;
8
WHEREAS, the parties have reached a settlement in principle and wish to have an
9
additional thirty (30) days to complete the settlement documentation and to perform the terms of
10
11
12
13
such settlement.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the
respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that:
The parties shall have an additional 30 days from May 26, 2017 to June 26, 2017, to file a
14
dismissal with prejudice or, in the event settlement is not finalized, a proposed extension or a
15
proposed hearing date and briefing schedule for the Motion.
16
17
SO STIPULATED.
Dated: May 25, 2017
ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
18
19
By:
20
21
/s/ Gilbert R. Serota
GILBERT R. SEROTA
ALISON C. EPSTEIN
Attorneys for Defendants Franklin Templeton Investor
Services, LLC, Franklin/Templeton Distributors Inc.,
and Templeton Institutional Funds
22
23
24
Dated: May 25, 2017
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
25
By:
26
/s/ Raymond F. Lynch
RAYMOND F. LYNCH
MATTHEW J. PECK
27
28
Attorneys for Board of Retirement of the Imperial
County Employees; Retirement System
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SECOND ORDER EXTENDING DATE TO RE-FILE MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 3:17-cv-01784-JCS
|
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
that:
4
The parties shall have an additional thirty (30) days from May 26, 2017 to June 26, 2017, to
5
file a dismissal with prejudice or, in the event settlement is not finalized, a proposed extension or a
6
proposed hearing date and briefing schedule for the Motion.
7
The Court does not anticipate granting any further extensions.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
DATED:
June 8, 2017
____________________________________
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SECOND ORDER EXTENDING DATE TO RE-FILE MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 3:17-cv-01784-JCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?