Greenberg v. Target Corporation

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER To Extend Time To Respond To Complaint. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/1/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TODD GREENBERG, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Case No.: 17-cv-01862-LB-RS CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota Corporation, Defendant. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 2 Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to 3 Complaint, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court GRANTS the parties’ joint 4 stipulation. Defendant shall have until 30 days after the filing of an amended Complaint to 5 answer or otherwise respond. 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: ___________ 5/1/17 _________________________________ Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?