Trout v. Comcast Corporation
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER to continue hearing date and case management conference. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/14/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
MICHAEL J. STORTZ (SBN 139386)
Michael.Stortz@dbr.com
MATTHEW J. ADLER (SBN 273147)
Matthew.Adler@dbr.com
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2235
Telephone:
(415) 591-7500
Facsimile:
(415) 591-7510
Attorneys for Defendant
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
12
JAMIE TROUT, individually, and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
COMCAST CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
Case No. 3:17-cv-01912-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE
AND CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; DECLARATION OF
MICHAEL J. STORTZ IN SUPPORT
16
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
A TTORN E YS A T L A W
S A N F RA N C I S C O
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING AND CMC; STORTZ
DECLARATION
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01912-RS
1
WHEREAS, on August 7, 2017, this Court issued a Notice (Dkt. No. 30) continuing the
2
hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Compel Individual Arbitration and Stay Litigation (“Motion”)
3
to September 21, 2017;
WHEREAS, due to a conflict that arose following the Court’s Notice, Defendant’s
4
5
counsel is unavailable for hearing on September 21, 2017; and
6
WHEREAS, the parties through counsel have agreed to continue the hearing to October
7
26, 2017, and to continue the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for October 5,
8
2017 to November 9, 2017;
9
10
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED by and between the parties through counsel as
follows:
1.
12
13
14
15
16
17
The hearing on Defendant’s Motion shall be continued to October 26, 2017 at 1:30
2.
11
The Case Management Conference shall be continued to November 9, 2017 at
p.m.
10:00 a.m.
3.
The parties’ joint Case Management Statement shall be filed on or before
November 2, 2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
A TTORN E YS A T L A W
S A N F RA N C I S C O
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING AND CMC; STORTZ
DECLARATION
-2-
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01912-RS
1
Dated: September 13, 2017
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
2
3
By: /s/ Michael J. Stortz
Michael J. Stortz
Matthew J. Adler
4
5
Attorneys for Defendant
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS,
LLC
6
7
8
Dated: September 13, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
9
By: /s/ Todd M. Friedman
Todd M. Friedman
Adrian Bacon
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JAMIE TROUT
12
13
Attestation Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)
14
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I, Michael J. Stortz, hereby attest that I have obtained
15
concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatory to this document. I declare
16
under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true
17
and correct. Executed this 13th day of September, 2017 in San Francisco, California.
18
/s/ Michael J. Stortz
Michael J. Stortz
19
20
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
9/14/17
Dated: ___________
Hon. Richard Seeborg
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
A TTORN E YS A T L A W
S A N F RA N C I S C O
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING AND CMC; STORTZ
DECLARATION
-3-
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01912-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?