Peacock v. The 21st Amendment Brewery Cafe, LLC

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #35 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER to Extend Time to Respond and Reply to Motion to Dismiss filed by The 21st Amendment Brewery Cafe, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 7, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

JARED H. BECK (CA Bar No. 233743)
ELIZABETH LEE BECK (CA Bar No.
233742)
BEVERLY VIRUES
FL Bar No. 123713
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
BECK & LEE TRIAL LAWYERS
Corporate Park at Kendall
12485 SW 137th Ave., Suite 205
Miami, Florida 33186
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
CULLIN O’BRIEN
FL Bar No. 597341
[e-mail]
CULLIN O’BRIEN LAW, P.A.
6541 NE 21st Way
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33108
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

20

BRENDAN PEACOCK, on Behalf of
Himself, and All Others Similarly
Situated,
Plaintiff,

22

v.

23

THE 21ST AMENDMENT
BREWERY CAFE, LLC,

25

Counsel for Defendant

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

21

24

EUGENE M. PAK (CA Bar No. 168699)
[e-mail]
KATHERINE KAO (CA Bar No. 267475)
[e-mail]
WENDEL ROSEN BLACK & DEAN LLP
1111 Broadway, 24th Fl.
Oakland, California 94607
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17
19

Counsel for Plaintiff and Putative Class

Counsel for Plaintiff and Putative Class

16
18

DAVID D. SOHN (CA Bar No. 221119)
[e-mail]
SOHN LEGAL GROUP, P.C.
275 Battery St., Suite 200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Case No: 3:17-cv-01918 JST
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
AND EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME
TO REPLY
Complaint Filed: April 6, 2017
Trial Date: None Set

Defendant.

26
27
28

018602.0010\4842454.1

Peacock v. The 21st Amendment Brewery Cafe, Case No. 3:17-cv-01918
STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTEND
DEFENDANT’S TIME TO REPLY

1

Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff Brendan Peacock (“Plaintiff”), and

2

Defendant, The 21st Amendment Brewery Cafe, LLC (“Defendant”), through their respective

3

counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

4

Whereas, the Complaint was filed in this court on April 6, 2017.

5

Whereas, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint on July 31, 2017.

6

Whereas, on August 14, 2017, this court issued an Order granting Plaintiff and

7

Defendant’s Stipulation to extend the deadline to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss

8

Plaintiff’s Complaint to September 13, 2017, and extend the deadline for Defendant to file a

9

Reply to September 29, 2017.

10
11
12

The parties stipulate and respectfully request an extension up to and including September
27, 2017, for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
The parties further stipulate and respectfully request an extension up to and including

13

October 11, 2017 for Defendant to Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to

14

Dismiss.

15

The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is currently set for November 2, 2017.

16
17

DATED: September 6, 2017
/s/ Elizabeth Lee Beck
Elizabeth Lee Beck
Counsel for Plaintiff and Putative Class

18
19
20

DATED: September 6, 2017

21
22

/s/ Eugene M. Pak
Eugene M. Pak
Counsel for Defendant

23
24
25
26
27
28

018602.0010\4842454.1

Peacock v. The 21st Amendment Brewery Cafe, Case No. 3:17-cv-01918
STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTEND
DEFENDANT’S TIME TO REPLY

1

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATIONS, IT IS SO ORDERED:

2
3
4
5

Sepember 7
DATED: ____________________, 2017

By: ________________________________
HON. JON S. TIGAR

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

018602.0010\4842454.1

Peacock v. The 21st Amendment Brewery Cafe, Case No. 3:17-cv-01918
STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTEND
DEFENDANT’S TIME TO REPLY