Laura Redfern v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 TO CONTINUE LAST DAY TO HEAR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS filed by Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. Motion Hearing set for 5/24/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/5/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2018)
4
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
GARY T. LAFAYETTE (State Bar No. 088666)
BRIAN H. CHUN (State Bar No. 215417)
1300 Clay Street, Suite 810
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (415) 357-4600
Facsimile: (415) 357-4605
5
Attorneys for Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
1
2
3
6
10
CHRISTOPHER B. DOLAN (SBN 165358)
EMILE A. DAVIS (SBN 208394)
MARI BANDOMA CALLADO (SBN 288320)
THE DOLAN LAW FIRM PC
1438 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: (415) 421-2800
Facsimile: (415) 421-2830
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff Laura Redfern
7
8
(415) 357-4600
(415) 357-4605
FAX
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
STREET, SUITE 810
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612
12
1300 CLAY
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
9
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
LAURA REDFERN, an individual.
17
Case No. 3:17-cv-01944
Plaintiff,
18
vs.
19
20
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., a Delaware
Corporation, and DOES 1 through 25,
inclusive.
21
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO
CONTINUE LAST DAY TO HEAR
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE LAST DAY TO HEAR DISPOSITIVE
MOTIONS; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:17-cv-01944
1
2
STIPULATION AND REQUEST
Plaintiff Laura Redfern (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
3
(“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”) through their respective counsel hereby stipulate as
4
follows:
5
WHEREAS the last day to hear dispositive motions is currently May 10, 2018;
6
WHEREAS pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(a), the last day to file dispositive motions is
7
8
9
10
(415) 357-4600
(415) 357-4605
FAX
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
STREET, SUITE 810
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612
12
1300 CLAY
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
11
13
14
currently April 5, 2018;
WHEREAS the Parties have been engaging in informal settlement discussions and have
now reached an agreement on a resolution amount;
WHEREAS the Parties are currently finalizing the other terms of the settlement and need
additional time to do so; and
WHEREAS the Parties desire to avoid the time and expense associated with a dispositive
motion if such a filing is unnecessary;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED by and
15
between the Parties through their respective attorneys of record that the last day to hear
16
dispositive motions be continued by two weeks to May 24, 2018.
17
18
19
DATED: April 4, 2018
20
THE DOLAN LAW FIRM
/s/ Mari Bandoma Callado
MARI BANDOMA CALLADO
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LAURA REDFERN
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
DATED: April 4, 2018
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
/s/ Brian H. Chun
BRIAN H. CHUN
Attorneys for Defendant
HOME DEPOT U.S.A, INC.
28
2
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE LAST DAY TO HEAR DISPOSITIVE
MOTIONS; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:17-cv-01944
1
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
2
3
I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence of Mari Bandoma Callado, counsel for
Plaintiff, for the filing of this stipulation.
4
/s/ Brian H. Chun
BRIAN H. CHUN
5
6
7
ORDER
8
Good cause appearing therefor and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby
9
ORDERED that the last day to hear dispositive motions be continued to May 24, 2018 at 1:30
p.m.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
S
United States District Judge
hen
LI
ER
FO
rd M. C
dwa
Judge E
H
17
DERED
R
Edward M. Chen IS SO O
IT
A
16
, 2018
UNIT
ED
(415) 357-4600
(415) 357-4605
FAX
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
15
4/5
RT
STREET, SUITE 810
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612
14
DATED:
NO
1300 CLAY
13
RT
U
O
12
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
11
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
10
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE LAST DAY TO HEAR DISPOSITIVE
MOTIONS; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:17-cv-01944
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?