POP MIDDLE EAST, INC., a foreign corporation v. POPSUGAR INC., a Delaware corporation et al
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY EDWARD KLARIS by Hon. William Alsup denying 6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2017)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
POP MIDDLE EAST, INC.,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
POPSUGAR INC., and EBATES INC.,
No. C 17-02015 WHA
ORDER DENYING PRO
HAC VICE APPLICATION
OF ATTORNEY EDWARD
The pro hac vice application of Attorney Edward Klaris (Dkt. No. 6) is DENIED for
failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he
or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest
court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added).
Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the
state of bar membership — such as “the bar of New York” — is inadequate under the local rule
because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid
again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 17, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?