POP MIDDLE EAST, INC., a foreign corporation v. POPSUGAR INC., a Delaware corporation et al
Filing
34
Order by Hon. William Alsup granting 30 Stipulation. Case Management Conference set for 8/17/2017 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 8/17/2017 08:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
David M. Given, (CSG. 142375)
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP
39 Mesa Street, Suite 201 - The Presidio
San Francisco, CA 94129
Telephone: 415-398-0900
Fax:
415-398-0911
Email: dmg@phillaw.com
Edward Klaris (Pro Hac Vice)
KLARIS LAW PLLC
475 Park Avenue South, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10016
Telephone: 917-822-7468
Email: edward.klaris@klarislaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
16
17
POP MIDDLE EAST, INC., a foreign
corporation,
Case No. 3:17-cv-02015-WHA
JOINT STIPULATION TO ENLARGE
TIME RE MOTION TO DISMISS AND
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiff,
v.
POPSUGAR INC., a Delaware corporation;
EBATES INC., a Delaware corporation,,
18
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
Defendants.
April 11, 2017
None Set
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Plaintiff Pop Middle East, Inc., Defendant POPSUGAR Inc., and Defendant Ebates, Inc.,
by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Pop Middle East, Inc. (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) filed its Complaint on
April 11, 2017 [Dkt 1];
WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the Complaint on Defendants POPSUGAR, Inc. and Ebates,
Inc. on April 13, 2017, and a responsive pleading was due on or about May 4, 2017 [Dkts. 7-1
and 7-2];
28
30
1165037
1
31
STIPULATION RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND CMC; PROPOSED ORDER
Case No. 3:17-cv-02015-WHA
32
1
2
3
4
5
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2017, Plaintiff agreed to extend Defendants’ time to answer or
otherwise respond to the complaint by 21 days, up to and including May 25, 2017 [Dkt. 11];
WHEREAS, on May 5, 2017, the Court scheduled an Initial Case Management
Conference for July 13, 2017;
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2017, Plaintiff agreed to a further extension of time for
6
Defendants to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint, up to and including June 15, 2017
7
[Dkt. 19];
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2017, Defendants POPSUGAR, Inc. and Ebates filed and served
their motions to dismiss, with a hearing date of July 27, 2017;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s oppositions to the motions to dismiss are due June 29, 2017, and
Defendants’ replies are due July 6, 2017;
WHEREAS, the parties are currently in the midst of settlement negotiations and require
additional time to draft and agree upon the terms of a settlement;
WHEREAS, in order to facilitate further settlement negotiations, the parties have agreed
15
to extend the deadlines (i) for Plaintiff’s oppositions to Defendants’ motions to dismiss to July 31,
16
2017, (ii) for Defendants’ replies to August 7, 2017, (iii) to continue the hearing date on
17
Defendants’ motions to dismiss to August 17, 2017 at 8:00 a.m., or to such other date as the court
18
has available; and (iv) request that the Initial Case Management Conference be continued from
19
July 13, 2017 to a future date, along with the F.R.C.P. Rule 26(f) deadlines;
20
WHEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties stipulate and agree that:
21
1.
22
Plaintiff’s time to file its opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss shall be
extended to July 31, 2017;
23
2.
Defendants’ time to file its replies shall be extended to August 7, 2017;
24
3.
That the hearing on Defendants’ motions to dismiss be continued to August 17,
25
2017 at 8:00 a.m., or to such other date as the Court has available; and
26
27
28
30
1165037
2
31
STIPULATION RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND CMC; PROPOSED ORDER
Case No. 3:17-cv-02015-WHA
32
1
4.
That the currently scheduled Initial Case Management Conference set for July 13,
2
2017 also be continued to August 17, 2017, or to such other date as the Court has available, along
3
with the F.R.C.P. Rule 26(f) deadlines.
4
5
Dated: June 27, 2017
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP
6
By /s/ David M. Given
DAVID M. GIVEN
7
8
KLARIS LAW PLLC
Edward Klaris (admitted pro hac vice)
9
By /s/ Edward J.Klaris____________________________
EDWARD J. KLARIS
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
POP MIDDLE EAST INC.
12
13
Dated: June 27, 2017
14
By /s/ Benedict Y. Hur
BENEDICT Y. HUR
JAY RAPAPORT
15
16
Attorneys for Defendant
POPSUGAR, INC.
17
18
Dated: June 27, 2017
19
Attorneys for Defendant
EBATES, INC.
21
22
24
25
26
27
THE LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS V. CHRISTOPHER
By /s/ Thomas V. Christopher
THOMAS V. CHRISTOPHER
20
23
KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP
ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that all other signatories listed, and on
whose behalf this filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.
Dated: June 27, 2017
/s/ Edward J.Klaris________________________
Edward J. Klaris
28
30
1165037
3
31
STIPULATION RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND CMC; PROPOSED ORDER
Case No. 3:17-cv-02015-WHA
32
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that:
3
1.
4
extended from June 29, 2017 to July 31, 2017;
5
6
2.
9
Defendants’ time to file its replies shall be extended from July 6, 2017 to August
7, 2017;
7
8
Plaintiff’s time to file its opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss shall be
3.
That the hearing on Defendants’ motions to dismiss to be continued from July 27,
2017 to August 17, 2017 at 8:00 a.m., or to ____________________________;
4.
10
That the Initial Case Management Conference set for July 13, 2017 be continued
at 11:00 A.M.
August 17, 2017, or to ____________________________, along with the F.R.C.P. Rule 26(f)
11
deadlines.
12
SO ORDERED.
13
14
Dated:
_____________________________
Hon. William H. Alsup
United States District Judge
June 29, 2017.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
1165037
4
31
STIPULATION RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND CMC; PROPOSED ORDER
Case No. 3:17-cv-02015-WHA
32
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?