Gillespie et al v. Lumenis Inc.

Filing 28

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Lumenis Inc. and Plaintiff filed by Lumenis Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/17/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT H NORTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA COOPER GILLESPIE, et al CASE No C 3:l 7-cv-02080-EMC Plaintiff(s) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS V. LUMENIS INC. Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: m m Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) Ill Private ADR (specify process and provider) Mediation with Steve Rottman Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. .To request an early settlement conference ·with a Magistrate Judge, you mu.stfile a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: g the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) liJ other requested deadline: September 18, 2017 Date: 7/12117 Isl Rachel Terp Date:7112117 Isl Ashley A. Halberda Attorney for Plaintiff R NIA UNIT ED DERED hen rd M. C ge Edwa Jud U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE FO H LI RT E A 7/17/2017 TC O OR IT IS S NO Date: E AT T RT U O x D IT IS SO ORDERED D IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: S Attorney for Defendant ISTR IC SD C Important! E-jile this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these R choices: "Stipulation & Proposed N F Order Selecting Mediation" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed D IS T IC T O R Order Selecting Private ADR." Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?