Gillespie et al v. Lumenis Inc.
Filing
28
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Lumenis Inc. and Plaintiff filed by Lumenis Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/17/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
H
NORTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
COOPER GILLESPIE, et al
CASE No C 3:l 7-cv-02080-EMC
Plaintiff(s)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
V.
LUMENIS INC.
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
m
m
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Ill Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Mediation with Steve Rottman
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. .To request an
early settlement conference ·with a Magistrate
Judge, you mu.stfile a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
g the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
liJ other requested deadline: September 18, 2017
Date: 7/12117
Isl Rachel Terp
Date:7112117
Isl Ashley A. Halberda
Attorney for Plaintiff
R NIA
UNIT
ED
DERED
hen
rd M. C
ge Edwa
Jud
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FO
H
LI
RT
E
A
7/17/2017
TC
O OR
IT IS S
NO
Date:
E
AT
T
RT
U
O
x
D IT IS SO ORDERED
D IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
S
Attorney for Defendant ISTR
IC
SD
C
Important! E-jile this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these R
choices: "Stipulation & Proposed
N
F
Order Selecting Mediation" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed
D IS T IC T O
R
Order Selecting Private ADR."
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?