Hall v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 113

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 112 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Brian Cheu, Kevin Ian Kitchingham, City and County of San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 26, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137
TARA M. STEELEY, State Bar #231775
Deputy City Attorneys
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, California 94102-4682
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO;
KEVIN KITCHINGHAM, in his official capacity;
BRIAN CHEU, in his official capacity; and,
EMILY COHEN, in her official capacity

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14

PATRINA HALL,

15

Plaintiff,

16

vs.

17
18
19
20

Case No. C17-02161 JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
KEVIN IAN KITCHINGHAM, PROJECT
MANAGER, BRIAN CHEU, DIRECTOR OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, EMILY
COHEN,
Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CMC
CASE NO. C17-02161 JST

n:\govlit\li2017\171438\01313421.docx

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

WHEREAS, this Court entered an order to continue the Initial Case Management Conference
to November 14, 2018, (see Docket No. 104, filed August 6, 2018);
WHEREAS, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) is
pending, and the Court has not yet rendered a decision on the matter;
WHEREAS, continuing the conference until after the Court renders a decision on Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss the Complaint will conserve judicial resources and the parties’ resources;
WHEREAS, the parties jointly request that the Court continue the Initial Case Management

8

Conference to sixty (60) days after the Court rules on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Third Amended

9

Complaint, subject to the Court’s availability;

10

Accordingly, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-2, the parties stipulate as follows:

11

1.

Subject to the Court’s approval, the Initial Case Management Conference shall be

12

continued to sixty (60) days after the Court rules on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Third Amended

13

Complaint, or to a date shortly thereafter as set by the Court;

14

2.

The last day to file the Joint or Separate Case Management Statement, file the Rule

15

26(f) Report, and exchange initial disclosures shall be one week prior to the Case Management

16

Conference.

17

Dated: October 24, 2018

18
19

DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
WAYNE SNODGRASS
TARA M. STEELEY
Deputy City Attorneys

20
By: /s/Tara M. Steeley
TARA M. STEELEY
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO;
KEVIN KITCHINGHAM, in his official capacity;
BRIAN CHEU, in his official capacity; and,
EMILY COHEN, in her official capacity

21
22
23
24
25

Dated: October 24, 2018

26
27

By: **/s/Patrina Hall
PATRINA HALL
Plaintiff, in pro per

**PURSUANT TO GO 45, THE ELECTRONIC SIGNATORY HAS
OBTAINED APPROVAL FROM THIS SIGNATORY.

28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CMC
CASE NO. C17-02161 JST

2

n:\govlit\li2017\171438\01313421.docx

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
For good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS the following:
3
1.

Initial Case Management Conference, set for November 14, 2018, shall be continued to

4
a date sixty (60) days after the Court rules on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Third Amended
5
Complaint or shortly thereafter, as set by the Court.
6
2.

The last day to file the Joint or Separate Case Management Statement, file the Rule

7
26(f) Report, and exchange initial disclosures shall be one week prior to the conference.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11

Dated: October 26, 2018
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
Judge, United States District Court

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CMC
CASE NO. C17-02161 JST

3

n:\govlit\li2017\171438\01313421.docx