Hall v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
62
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 61 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO JANUARY 31, 2018 filed by Brian Cheu, Emily Cohen, Kevin Ian Kitchingham, City and County of San Francisco. Case Manag ement Statement due by 1/22/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/31/2018 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 30, 2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137
TARA M. STEELEY, State Bar #231775
Deputy City Attorneys
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, California 94102-4682
Telephone:
(415) 554-4655
Facsimile:
(415) 554-4699
E-Mail:
tara.steeley@sfgov.org
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO;
KEVIN KITCHINGHAM, in his official capacity;
BRIAN CHEU, in his official capacity; and,
EMILY COHEN, in her official capacity
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
PATRINA HALL,
15
Plaintiff,
16
vs.
17
18
19
20
Case No. C17-02161 JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO
JANUARY 31, 2018
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
KEVIN IAN KITCHINGHAM, PROJECT
MANAGER, BRIAN CHEU, DIRECTOR OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, EMILY
COHEN,
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CMC
CASE NO. C17-02161 JST
n:\govlit\li2017\171438\01193671.docx
1
2
3
4
5
WHEREAS, this Court entered an order to continue the Initial Case Management Conference
to November 15, 2017, (see Docket No. 56, filed September 6, 2017);
WHEREAS, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint is pending, and the
Court has not yet rendered a decision on the matter;
WHEREAS, continuing the conference until after the Court renders a decision on Defendants’
6
Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint will conserve judicial resources and the parties’
7
resources;
8
9
WHEREAS, the parties jointly request that the Court continue the Initial Case Management
Conference to January 31, 2018, subject to the Court’s availability;
10
Accordingly, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-2, the parties stipulate as follows:
11
1.
12
13
Subject to the Court’s approval, the Initial Case Management Conference shall be
continued to Wednesday, January 31, 2018, at 2:00 p.m., or to a date shortly thereafter;
2.
The last day to file the Joint or Separate Case Management Statement, file the Rule
14
26(f) Report, and exchange initial disclosures shall be one week prior to the Case Management
15
Conference.
16
Dated: October 30, 2017
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
WAYNE SNODGRASS
TARA M. STEELEY
Deputy City Attorneys
17
18
19
By:
/s/Tara M. Steeley
TARA M. STEELEY
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO;
KEVIN KITCHINGHAM, in his official capacity;
BRIAN CHEU, in his official capacity; and,
EMILY COHEN, in her official capacity
By:
20
**/s/Patrina Hall
PATRINA HALL
Plaintiff, in pro per
21
22
23
24
Dated: October 30, 2017
25
26
27
28
**PURSUANT TO GO 45, THE ELECTRONIC SIGNATORY HAS
OBTAINED APPROVAL FROM THIS SIGNATORY.
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CMC
1
CASE NO. C17-02161 JST
n:\govlit\li2017\171438\01193671.docx
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
For good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS the following:
3
1.
4
5
6
Initial Case Management Conference, set for November 15, 2017, shall be continued to
Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 2:00 pm.
2.
The last day to file the Joint or Separate Case Management Statement, file the Rule
nine days
26(f) Report, and exchange initial disclosures shall be one week prior to the conference.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
Dated:
October 30, 2017
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
Judge, United States District Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CMC
CASE NO. C17-02161 JST
2
n:\govlit\li2017\171438\01193671.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?