Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. Alibaba.com, Inc. et al
Filing
124
ORDER GRANTING #103 PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S MOTIONS TO WITHDRAW by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
IN RE GLOBAL EQUITY MANAGEMENT
(SA) PTY. LTD.
No. C 17-02177 WHA
No. C 17-02178 WHA
No. C 17-02435 WHA
12
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S
MOTIONS TO WITHDRAW
13
14
15
/
16
17
In 2015 and 2016, plaintiff Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. (GEMSA),
18
represented by Attorney William Ramey, brought the three above-captioned patent infringement
19
actions in the Eastern District of Texas against various defendants. These actions transferred to
20
our district in April 2017. Attorney John Thomas appeared for GEMSA shortly thereafter.
21
Attorneys Ramey and Thomas then filed motions to withdraw as counsel from all three
22
actions. All defendants opposed on the bases that (1) GEMSA, as a corporation, cannot appear
23
in these actions without counsel, and (2) Attorney Ramey allegedly pursued these actions in an
24
abusive manner and should not be permitted to escape the possible imposition of sanctions at
25
the end of litigation by withdrawing now.
26
Both issues have since been defused. In their reply briefs, Attorneys Ramey and
27
Thomas agreed that their withdrawal, if permitted, would not terminate the Court’s authority to
28
award any appropriate sanctions against either of them. Additionally, Attorneys William
Thomson, Jr., and David Randall have appeared as new counsel for GEMSA in all three actions.
1
Accordingly, Attorneys Ramey and Thomas’s motions to withdraw as counsel from all
2
three actions are GRANTED, save and except that the Court will retain jurisdiction over them to
3
entertain any motions for sanctions or further relief at the end of said actions.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: September 12, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?