Board of Trustees, et al v. Brock et al
Filing
35
ORDER re Final Judgment. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 09/22/2017. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, IN THEIR
8
CAPACITIES AS TRUSTEES OF THE
9
LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE
Case No. 17-cv-02183-EMC
ORDER RE FINAL JUDGMENT
Docket No.
TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN
11
CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
v.
13
14
CLINTON JEFFREY BROCK, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
Previously, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment as to two defendants
17
18
in the case, i.e., The Brock Company and Clinton Brock. The Court also gave Plaintiffs an
19
opportunity to submit additional information in support of the motion for default judgment against
20
the last defendant, i.e., the corporate entity known as The H.C. Brock Company. Plaintiffs have
21
not provided additional information regarding The H.C. Brock Company. Accordingly, the Court
22
finds, consistent with its prior order, that a default judgment is appropriate as to The Brock
23
Company and Clinton Brock, but not the corporation The H.C. Brock Company.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
The Clerk of the Court is instructed to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiffs with
2
respect to The Brock Company and Clinton Brock; the H.C. Brock Company, a corporation, is
3
dismissed without prejudice.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
Dated: September 22, 2017
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
10
12
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?