Kuc v. LION BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 7/20/17. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
POMERANTZ LLP
Jennifer Pafiti (SBN 282790)
468 North Camden Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Telephone:
(818) 532-6449
jpafiti@pomlaw.com
(additional counsel on signature page)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
)
)
AMRA KUC, Individually and on Behalf of )
)
All Others Similarly Situated,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
LION BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC., MANISH )
)
SINGH, MICHAEL HANDELMAN, and
)
ELMA HAWKINS
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
No. 3:17-cv-02188-SI
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL
CLASS ACTION
JUDGE: Hon. Susan Illston
TO: ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD
19
WHEREAS, the above-captioned action, Kuc v. Lion Biotechnologies, Inc. et al., 3:17-
20
cv-02188-SI (“Kuc”), filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
21
California on April 19, 2017, is a putative securities class action on behalf of a class consisting
22
of all persons other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired common shares of
23
Lion Biotechnologies, Inc. between November 14, 2013 and April 10, 2017, seeking to recover
24
compensable damages caused by Defendants’ violations of the federal securities laws and to
25
pursue remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule
26
10b-5 promulgated thereunder (Dkt. No. 1 at ¶ 1);
27
28
1
NOT. OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
3:17-cv-02188-SI
1
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2017, prior to the filing of the Kuc action, a substantially similar
2
action was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, under
3
style of Desilvio v. Lion Biotechnologies, Inc. et al., 3:17-cv-02086-SI (“Desilvio”), alleging
4
identical claims against the same Defendants, on behalf of the same putative class described in
5
the Kuc action (Desilvio Dkt. No. 1 at ¶ 1);
6
WHEREAS, the Desilvio action remains pending at the time of this submission;
7
WHEREAS, no Defendant in the Kuc action has served an answer or motion for summary
8
9
10
judgment; and
WHEREAS, due to the pendency of the Desilvio action, dismissal of the Kuc action will
not prejudice members of the class described in the two actions;
11
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
12
41(a)(1)(A), Plaintiff Amra Kuc hereby voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned action, without
13
prejudice, as to all defendants.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Dated: July 20, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
POMERANTZ LLP
/s/ Jennifer Pafiti
Jennifer Pafiti (SBN 282790)
468 North Camden Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Telephone:
(818) 532-6449
jpafiti@pomlaw.com
21
22
23
24
25
26
POMERANTZ LLP
Jeremy A. Lieberman
J. Alexander Hood II
600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Telephone:
(212) 661-1100
Facsimile:
(212) 661-8665
jalieberman@pomlaw.com
ahood@pomlaw.com
27
Counsel for Plaintiff
28
2
NOT. OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
3:17-cv-02188-SI
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that on July 30, 2017, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically and
3
served by mail on anyone unable to accept electronic filing. Notice of this filing will be sent by
4
e-mail to all parties by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system or by mail to anyone
5
unable to accept electronic filing as indicated on the Notice of Electronic Filing. Parties may
6
access this filing through the Court’s CM/ECF System.
7
/s/ Jennifer Pafiti
Jennifer Pafiti
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
NOT. OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
3:17-cv-02188-SI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
)
)
AMRA KUC, Individually and on Behalf of )
)
All Others Similarly Situated,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
LION BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC., MANISH )
)
SINGH, MICHAEL HANDELMAN, and
)
ELMA HAWKINS
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
No. 3:17-cv-02188-SI
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
CLASS ACTION
JUDGE: Hon. Susan Illston
13
WHEREAS, the above-captioned action, Kuc v. Lion Biotechnologies, Inc. et al., 3:1714
cv-02188-SI (“Kuc”), filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
15
California on April 19, 2017, is a putative securities class action on behalf of a class consisting
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
of all persons other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired common shares of
Lion Biotechnologies, Inc. between November 14, 2013 and April 10, 2017, seeking to recover
compensable damages caused by Defendants’ violations of the federal securities laws and to
pursue remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule
10b-5 promulgated thereunder (Dkt. No. 1 at ¶ 1);
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2017, prior to the filing of the Kuc action, a substantially similar
action was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, under
style of Desilvio v. Lion Biotechnologies, Inc. et al., 3:17-cv-02086-SI (“Desilvio”), alleging
identical claims against the same Defendants, on behalf of the same putative class described in
the Kuc action (Desilvio Dkt. No. 1 at ¶ 1);
WHEREAS, the Desilvio action remains pending;
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
3:17-cv-02188-SI
1
2
3
4
WHEREAS, no Defendant in the Kuc action has served an answer or motion for summary
judgment; and
WHEREAS, due to the pendency of the Desilvio action, dismissal of the Kuc action will
not prejudice members of the class described in the two actions;
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
6
The Kuc action is dismissed without prejudice as to all Defendants.
7
8
SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
July 20
Dated: ___________________, 2017
San Francisco, California
12
13
14
Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
3:17-cv-02188-SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?