Jones v. CertifiedSafety, Inc.
Filing
48
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 47 for Conditional Certification of Collective. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/24/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2017)
1
5
CAROLYN H. COTTRELL, Bar No. 166977
DAVID C. LEIMBACH, Bar No. 265409
SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL
KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP
2000 Powell Street, Suite 1400
Emeryville, CA 94608
Telephone:
415.421.7100
Fax No.:
415.421.7105
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, the Class and Collective
7
MICHELLE B. HEVERLY, Bar No. 178660
ANGELA RAFOTH, Bar No. 241966
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
333 Bush Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415.433.1940
Fax No.:
415.399.8490
2
3
4
8
9
10
11
14
JAMES M. CLEARY, Texas Bar No. 00783838
MARTIN, DISIERE, JEFFERSON & WISDOM, LLP
808 Travis, 20th Floor
Houston, TX 77002
Telephone: 713.632.1775
Fax No.:
713.222.0101
Pro Hac Vice
15
Attorneys for Defendant
12
13
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
HAROLD JONES and GENEA KNIGHT,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
20
21
22
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:17-cv-2229-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF
COLLECTIVE
Complaint Filed:
April 21, 2017
CERTIFIEDSAFETY, INC.,
23
24
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION AS FLSA COLLECTIVE
ACTION
Harold Jones et al. v. CertifiedSafety, Inc., Case No. 3:17-cv-2229-RS
1
Plaintiffs
Harold
Jones
and
Genea
Knight
(“Plaintiffs”)
and
Defendant
2
CertifiedSafety, Inc. (“Defendant”) (Plaintiffs and Defendant are collectively referred to as the
3
“Parties”), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
4
1.
Plaintiff Jones initiated this action on April 21, 2017 and, in addition to claims under
5
California state wage and hour laws, alleged Defendant violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29
6
U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. (“FLSA”), and asserted these claims on behalf of a national Collective (ECF 1).
7
The proposed Collective is defined as follows:
8
9
All current and former hourly, non-exempt safety attendants and foremen of
CertifiedSafety, Inc., in the United States, during the time period October 1, 2014
until the resolution of this action.
10
11
2.
Plaintiff Jones alleged that Defendant has violated the FLSA with respect to Plaintiff
12
and the Collective by, inter alia, failing to compensate Plaintiff and the Collective for all hours worked
13
and, with respect to such hours, failing to pay the legally mandated overtime premium for such work
14
and/or minimum wage;
15
3.
On June 26, 2017, Plaintiff Jones amended his pleading to add an additional
16
representative Plaintiff, Genea Knight, who asserted the same claims under the FLSA on behalf of a
17
proposed national Collective, and also asserted claims under Washington state law on behalf of a
18
Washington State Class (ECF 23);
19
4.
Plaintiffs request that the Court authorize mailing of the proposed Notice of Collective
20
Action Lawsuit and Opt-In Consent Form, attached as Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of Carolyn
21
H. Cottrell, to all persons within the proposed Collective who have been employed by Defendant in
22
the United States at any time after October 1, 2014.
23
5.
Given the threshold required for conditional certification under Section 216(b) of the
24
FLSA, to facilitate mediation and/or other alternative dispute resolution, and to promote efficiency
25
and conserve resources among the Parties’ and the Court, the Parties have agreed to stipulate to the
26
Court’s entry of an order conditionally certifying a nationwide FLSA Collective;
27
28
6.
The decision by Defendant not to oppose the conditional certification of the FLSA
2.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION AS FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION
Harold Jones et al. v. CertifiedSafety, Inc., Case No. 3:17-cv-2229-RS
1
collective action does not constitute an admission that the named Plaintiffs meet the conditions
2
necessary for certification of a FLSA collective action, or that Defendant is liable in any way under
3
the FLSA in regards to Plaintiffs or any prospective class members. Defendant retains the right to
4
move to decertify the Collective action and/or oppose any request by Plaintiffs for final certification
5
of this Collective action. Further, the Parties explicitly agree that Defendant’s consent to this
6
Stipulation is without prejudice to any and all arguments Defendant may make in opposition to any
7
motion for certification of any class or subclass under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, and that the
8
FLSA conditional certification contemplated herein shall have no bearing on any proceedings related
9
to certification under Rule 23;
10
7.
Within 14 days of this Order, Defendant shall provide to Plaintiffs’ a third-party
11
administrator a computer-readable data file containing the names, job titles, last known mailing
12
addresses, email addresses telephone numbers, both home and cellular, and social security numbers of
13
all persons within the Collective description herein (“File”). The administrator shall be instructed to
14
send the agreed-upon Notice to the listed individuals as set forth below:
15
16
All current and former hourly, non-exempt Safety Attendants and Safety Foreman, of
CertifiedSafety, Inc., in the United States, during the time period October 1, 2014 until
the resolution of this action.
17
18
8.
Plaintiffs will select a third-party notice administrator (“Notice Administrator”) to mail
19
the proposed Notice of Collective Action Lawsuit and Opt-In Consent Form to all persons identified
20
in Defendant’s list within seven (7) days of the of this Order. Plaintiffs shall pay the costs of the
21
administrator, subject to claiming the costs as a reimbursable litigation expense. The Notice of
22
Collective Action Lawsuit and Opt-In Consent Form shall be sent by the Notice Administrator via first
23
class mail within seven (7) days of receipt of the list of Defendant’s eligible current and former
24
employees, or as soon thereafter as practicable. For those employees who Defendant provides an
25
email address for, the Notice Administrator shall email the Notice of Collective Action Lawsuit and
26
Opt-In Consent Form to those email addresses within seven (7) days of receipt of the list of
27
Defendant’s eligible current and former employees, or as soon thereafter as practicable.
28
3.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION AS FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION
Harold Jones et al. v. CertifiedSafety, Inc., Case No. 3:17-cv-2229-RS
1
9.
Eligible persons shall have sixty (60) days from the date on which the Notice of
2
Collective Action Lawsuit and Opt-In Consent Form is sent via first class mail (the “Opt-In Deadline”)
3
in which to postmark or return their Opt-In Consent Form for receipt by the Notice Administrator.
4
After the Notice of Collective Action Lawsuit and Opt-In Consent Form has been sent to the class
5
members, the Notice Administrator may send one reminder postcard (content and format of which to
6
be agreed between the parties) to any class member who has not opted into this case. The Notice
7
Administrator may also communicate with any Class member who contacts the Notice Administrator
8
for additional information about this litigation. The Notice Administrator shall not provide the File to
9
counsel for Plaintiffs.
10
10.
The Notice Administrator shall provide the Opt-In Consent Forms to Plaintiffs’
11
Counsel upon receipt of the Opt In Consent Form. Plaintiffs’ Counsel will file received Opt-In Consent
12
Forms with the Court as soon as practicable.
13
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED:
14
15
That this action be conditionally certified as a FLSA collective action, pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
§§ 201 et seq.
16
17
Dated: October 23, 2017
18
/s/ James M. Clearly, Jr.
MICHELLE HEVERLY
ANGELA RAFOTH
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
19
20
21
JAMES M. CLEARY, JR.
MARTIN, DISIERE, JEFFERSON &
WISDOM, LLC
22
23
Attorneys for Defendant
CERTIFIEDSAFETY, INC.
24
25
+
26
27
28
4.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION AS FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION
Harold Jones et al. v. CertifiedSafety, Inc., Case No. 3:17-cv-2229-RS
1
Dated: October 23, 2017
2
3
/s/ Carolyn H. Cottrell
CAROLYN H. COTTRELL
DAVID C. LEIMBACH
SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL
KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP
4
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HAROLD JONES
7
8
9
[PROPOSED] ORDER
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiffs
Harold
Jones
and
Genea
Knight
(“Plaintiffs”)
and
Defendant
CertifiedSafety, Inc. (“Defendant”) (Plaintiffs and Defendant are collectively referred to as the
“Parties”), have stipulated to conditionally certify as a FLSA collective action, pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
§§ 201 et seq., the following Collective:
All current and former hourly, non-exempt Safety Attendants and Safety Foreman, of
CertifiedSafety, Inc., in the United States, during the time period October 1, 2014 until
the resolution of this action.
17
Plaintiffs allege that Defendant has violated the FLSA with respect to Plaintiffs and the
18
Collective by, inter alia, failing to compensate Plaintiff and the Collective for all hours worked and,
19
with respect to such hours, failing to pay the legally mandated overtime premium for such work and/or
20
minimum wage.
21
Having considered the parties’ Stipulation, the allegations in Plaintiffs’ First Amended
22
Complaint, and given the low threshold for conditional certification under Section 216(b) of the FLSA,
23
see Ramirez v. Ghilotti Bros. Inc., 941 F. Supp. 2d 1197, 1203 (N.D. Cal. 2013), Plaintiffs have met
24
the lenient standard at this stage of the case to provide substantial allegations that they are “similarly
25
situated” under the FLSA to the proposed Collective members.
26
The decision by Defendant not to oppose the conditional certification of the FLSA collective
27
action does not constitute an admission that the named Plaintiffs meet the conditions necessary for
28
5.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION AS FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION
Harold Jones et al. v. CertifiedSafety, Inc., Case No. 3:17-cv-2229-RS
1
certification of a FLSA collective action. Defendant retains the right to move to decertify the
2
Collective action and/or oppose any request by Plaintiffs for final certification of this Collective action.
3
However, at this time, the Court has determined Plaintiffs’ allegations are sufficient to provide
4
Defendant’s other non-exempt employees notice of the litigation and an opportunity to opt-in to the
5
action to pursue their FLSA claims.
6
7
Therefore, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification and to Facilitate Notice under 29
U.S.C. § 216(b) is GRANTED as follows:
8
1. Within fourteen (14) days of this Order, Defendant shall provide to Plaintiffs’ third-party
9
administrator a computer-readable data file (“File”) containing the names, job titles, last known
10
mailing addresses, email addresses, telephone numbers, both home and cellular, and social
11
security numbers of all persons within the following definition:
12
13
14
All current and former hourly, non-exempt Safety Attendants and Safety
Foreman, of CertifiedSafety, Inc., in the United States, during the time period
October 1, 2014 until the resolution of this action. Defendant shall provide this
information for any person who has been employed by Defendant as provided
by the above definition.
15
2. The Proposed Notice and Opt-In Form, attached to the parties’ Stipulation as Exhibits A and
16
B to the Declaration of Carolyn H. Cottrell, are approved.
17
3. Within seven (7) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiffs will select a third-party notice
18
administrator (“Notice Administrator”) to mail and email the proposed Notice of Collective
19
Action Lawsuit and Opt-In Consent Form to all persons identified in Defendant’s list.
20
Plaintiffs shall pay the costs of the administrator, subject to claiming the costs as a reimbursable
21
litigation expense. The Notice of Collective Action Lawsuit and Opt-In Consent Form shall
22
be sent by the Notice Administrator via first class mail within seven (7) days of receipt of the
23
list of Defendant’s eligible current and former employees, or as soon thereafter as practicable.
24
For those employees who Defendant provides an email address for, the Notice Administrator
25
shall email the Notice of Collective Action Lawsuit and Opt-In Consent Form to those email
26
addresses within seven (7) days of receipt of the list of Defendant’s eligible current and former
27
28
employees, or as soon thereafter as practicable.
6.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION AS FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION
Harold Jones et al. v. CertifiedSafety, Inc., Case No. 3:17-cv-2229-RS
1
4. Eligible persons shall be given sixty (60) days from the date on which the Notice of Collective
2
Action Lawsuit and Opt-In Consent Form is sent via first class mail in which to postmark or
3
return their Opt-In Consent Form for receipt by the Notice Administrator. After the Notice of
4
Collective Action Lawsuit and Opt-In Consent Form has been sent to the class members, the
5
Notice Administrator will send one reminder postcard (content and format of which to be
6
agreed between the parties) to putative collective action members to confirm receipt of the
7
Notice of Collective Action Lawsuit and Opt-In Consent Form. The Notice Administrator may
8
also communicate with any Class member who contacts the Notice Administrator for
9
additional information about this litigation. The Notice Administrator shall not provide the File
10
to counsel for Plaintiffs.
11
5. The Notice Administrator shall provide the Opt-In Consent Forms to Plaintiffs’ Counsel upon
12
receipt of the Opt In Consent Form. Plaintiffs’ Counsel will file received Opt-In Consent Forms
13
with the Court as soon as practicable.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
10/24/17
Dated:__________________________
_______________________________________
HON. RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
Firmwide:149904539.1 093427.1001
DRAFT 9/6/17
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION AS FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION
Harold Jones et al. v. CertifiedSafety, Inc., Case No. 3:17-cv-2229-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?