Hardney v. Ferguson et al.

Filing 28

ORDER REVOKING PLAINTIFFS IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS re 14 Order. Signed by Judge James Donato on 5/3/18. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOHN HARDNEY, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 17-cv-02390-JD v. JEFFREY FERGUSON, et al., ORDER REVOKING PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that 14 was dismissed at screening. Plaintiff filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit and the case has been 15 referred back to this Court for the limited purpose of determining whether plaintiff’s in forma 16 pauperis status should continue or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. 17 An indigent party who cannot afford the expense of pursuing an appeal may file a motion 18 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Pursuant 19 to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a), “a party to a district-court action who desires to 20 appeal in forma pauperis must file a motion in the district court.” The party must attach an 21 affidavit that (1) shows in detail “the party’s inability to pay or give security for fees and costs,” 22 (2) “claims an entitlement to redress,” and (3) “states the issues that the party intends to present on 23 appeal.” Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1). However, even if a party provides proof of indigence, “an 24 appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in 25 good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). An appeal is in “good faith” where it seeks review of any 26 issue that is “non-frivolous.” Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). 27 An issue is “frivolous” if it has “no arguable basis in fact or law.” See O’Loughlin v. Doe, 920 28 F.2d 614, 617 (9th Cir. 1990). 1 Plaintiff alleged that he was improperly denied parole. He sought injunctive relief and 2 money damages. Plaintiff was informed that to the extent he wished to challenge his parole denial 3 or the disproportionality of his sentence, he must file a habeas petition. In order to recover 4 damages for an allegedly unconstitutional conviction or imprisonment, or for other harm caused 5 by actions whose unlawfulness would render a conviction or sentence invalid, a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 6 plaintiff must first prove that the conviction or sentence has been reversed on direct appeal, 7 expunged by executive. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to amend but failed to present a 8 cognizable claim. Plaintiff’s action has no arguable basis in fact or law; therefore, plaintiff’s in 9 forma pauperis status is REVOKED. The Clerk shall forward this Order to the Ninth Circuit in 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 case No. 18-15688. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 3, 2018 13 14 JAMES DONATO United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 JOHN HARDNEY, Case No. 17-cv-02390-JD Plaintiff, 6 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 8 JEFFREY FERGUSON, et al., Defendants. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 12 13 14 15 16 That on May 3, 2018, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 17 18 19 20 John Hardney D-00599 Mule Creek State Prison P.O. Box 409020 Ione, CA 95640 21 22 Dated: May 3, 2018 23 24 25 Susan Y. Soong Clerk, United States District Court 26 27 28 By:________________________ LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable JAMES DONATO 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?