Hardney v. Ferguson et al.
Filing
28
ORDER REVOKING PLAINTIFFS IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS re 14 Order. Signed by Judge James Donato on 5/3/18. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JOHN HARDNEY,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 17-cv-02390-JD
v.
JEFFREY FERGUSON, et al.,
ORDER REVOKING
PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA
PAUPERIS STATUS
Defendants.
12
13
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that
14
was dismissed at screening. Plaintiff filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit and the case has been
15
referred back to this Court for the limited purpose of determining whether plaintiff’s in forma
16
pauperis status should continue or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith.
17
An indigent party who cannot afford the expense of pursuing an appeal may file a motion
18
for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Pursuant
19
to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a), “a party to a district-court action who desires to
20
appeal in forma pauperis must file a motion in the district court.” The party must attach an
21
affidavit that (1) shows in detail “the party’s inability to pay or give security for fees and costs,”
22
(2) “claims an entitlement to redress,” and (3) “states the issues that the party intends to present on
23
appeal.” Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1). However, even if a party provides proof of indigence, “an
24
appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in
25
good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). An appeal is in “good faith” where it seeks review of any
26
issue that is “non-frivolous.” Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002).
27
An issue is “frivolous” if it has “no arguable basis in fact or law.” See O’Loughlin v. Doe, 920
28
F.2d 614, 617 (9th Cir. 1990).
1
Plaintiff alleged that he was improperly denied parole. He sought injunctive relief and
2
money damages. Plaintiff was informed that to the extent he wished to challenge his parole denial
3
or the disproportionality of his sentence, he must file a habeas petition. In order to recover
4
damages for an allegedly unconstitutional conviction or imprisonment, or for other harm caused
5
by actions whose unlawfulness would render a conviction or sentence invalid, a 42 U.S.C. § 1983
6
plaintiff must first prove that the conviction or sentence has been reversed on direct appeal,
7
expunged by executive. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to amend but failed to present a
8
cognizable claim. Plaintiff’s action has no arguable basis in fact or law; therefore, plaintiff’s in
9
forma pauperis status is REVOKED. The Clerk shall forward this Order to the Ninth Circuit in
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
case No. 18-15688.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 3, 2018
13
14
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
JOHN HARDNEY,
Case No. 17-cv-02390-JD
Plaintiff,
6
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
7
8
JEFFREY FERGUSON, et al.,
Defendants.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
12
13
14
15
16
That on May 3, 2018, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
17
18
19
20
John Hardney
D-00599
Mule Creek State Prison
P.O. Box 409020
Ione, CA 95640
21
22
Dated: May 3, 2018
23
24
25
Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court
26
27
28
By:________________________
LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable JAMES DONATO
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?