Jarvis v. UNUM

Filing 25

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 selecting Private ADR by Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company filed by Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/3/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Jeffrey Jarvis, D.D.S., CASE No C 3:17-cv-02409-EMC Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Unum, and Does 1-50, Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) ■ Private ADR (specify process and provider) Parties will select a specific mediator in the near future. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) other requested deadline: Decmeber 31, 2017 Date: July 19, 2017 Date: July 19, 2017 s/Eric Whitehead Attorney for Plaintiff s/ Robert E. Hess Attorney for Defendant 8/3/17 UNIT ED Date: ISTRIC ES D TC T TA D RDERE OO IT IS S RT U O IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: S xx IT R NIA ■ RT FO NO U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE n JUDGE Che ard M. dw Judge E Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017 LI A H Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed ER C Order Selecting Private ADR.” N F D IS T IC T O R

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?