Jarvis v. UNUM
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 selecting Private ADR by Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company filed by Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/3/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jeffrey Jarvis, D.D.S.,
CASE No C 3:17-cv-02409-EMC
Plaintiff(s)
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Unum, and Does 1-50,
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
■
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Parties will select a specific mediator in the
near future.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline: Decmeber 31, 2017
Date: July 19, 2017
Date: July 19, 2017
s/Eric Whitehead
Attorney for Plaintiff
s/ Robert E. Hess
Attorney for Defendant
8/3/17
UNIT
ED
Date:
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
RT
U
O
IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
S
xx IT
R NIA
■
RT
FO
NO
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE n
JUDGE
Che
ard M.
dw
Judge E
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
LI
A
H
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
ER
C
Order Selecting Private ADR.”
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?