Jarvis v. UNUM

Filing 46

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND CERTAIN CASE MANAGEMENT DATES. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/18/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY JARVIS, D.D.S., Case No. 3:17-cv-02409-EMC Plaintiff, (Honorable Edward M. Chen) 14 PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, and Does 115 50, [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND CERTAIN CASE MANAGEMENT DATES 12 13 16 vs. Defendants. (revised) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 633 West 5th Street, 47th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2043 213-680-2800 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND CERTAIN CASE MANAGEMENT DATES CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02409-EMC 302209415v1 0998589 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause appearing, it is 3 hereby ordered that the trial and certain case management dates and deadlines be 4 continued as follows: 5 Current Date 6 New Date 7 Expert Opening Reports 7/26/2018 10/12/18 8 Expert Rebuttal Reports 8/16/2018 11/9/18 9 Expert Discovery Cutoff 9/6/2018 12/21/18 10 Dispositive Motion Filing: 9/20/2018 11/9/18 11 Dispositive Motion Hearing: 10/25/2018 12/21/18 12 Final Pre Trial Conference: 1/8/2019 5/14/19 13 Trial 2/4/2019 6/10/19 14 15 This case is referred to magistrate judge for settlement conference. 16 Settlement conference is to be held within 60 days. Status remains 17 set for 8/9/18 at 10:30 a.m. Updated joint status report due 8/2/18. 18 22 J ER H 25 . Chen ward M udge Ed FO RT 24 United States District Judge NO 23 R NIA 7/18/2018 LI DATED: DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI EdwardS MO A M. Chen A 21 UNIT ED 20 S IT IS SO ORDERED. RT U O 19 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 26 27 28 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 633 West 5th Street, 47th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2043 213-680-2800 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND CERTAIN CASE MANAGEMENT DATES Case No. 3:17-cv-02409-EMC 302209415v1 0998589

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?