Jarvis v. UNUM
Filing
46
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND CERTAIN CASE MANAGEMENT DATES. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/18/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 JEFFREY JARVIS, D.D.S.,
Case No. 3:17-cv-02409-EMC
Plaintiff,
(Honorable Edward M. Chen)
14 PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT
INSURANCE COMPANY, and Does 115 50,
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING TRIAL AND
CERTAIN CASE
MANAGEMENT DATES
12
13
16
vs.
Defendants.
(revised)
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
633 West 5th Street, 47th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2043
213-680-2800
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND CERTAIN CASE MANAGEMENT DATES
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02409-EMC
302209415v1 0998589
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause appearing, it is
3
hereby ordered that the trial and certain case management dates and deadlines be
4
continued as follows:
5
Current Date
6
New Date
7
Expert Opening Reports
7/26/2018
10/12/18
8
Expert Rebuttal Reports
8/16/2018
11/9/18
9
Expert Discovery Cutoff
9/6/2018
12/21/18
10
Dispositive Motion Filing:
9/20/2018
11/9/18
11
Dispositive Motion Hearing:
10/25/2018
12/21/18
12
Final Pre Trial Conference:
1/8/2019
5/14/19
13
Trial
2/4/2019
6/10/19
14
15
This case is referred to magistrate judge for settlement conference.
16
Settlement conference is to be held within 60 days. Status remains
17
set for 8/9/18 at 10:30 a.m. Updated joint status report due 8/2/18.
18
22
J
ER
H
25
. Chen
ward M
udge Ed
FO
RT
24
United States District Judge
NO
23
R NIA
7/18/2018
LI
DATED:
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
EdwardS MO
A M. Chen
A
21
UNIT
ED
20
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
19
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
26
27
28
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
633 West 5th Street, 47th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2043
213-680-2800
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND CERTAIN CASE MANAGEMENT DATES
Case No. 3:17-cv-02409-EMC
302209415v1 0998589
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?