Raig Chaquico v. David Freiberg et al

Filing 136

ORDER RE: STIPULATION on Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule Cross Motions due by 12/13/2018. Motions due by 11/21/2018.. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 11/2/18. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2018)

Download PDF
CABANISS LAW 1 JOHN C. CABANISS (SBN 1002857) john@cabanisslaw.com 2 THOMAS ARMSTRONG (SBN 1016529) tom@cabanisslaw.com 3 839 N. Jefferson Street, Suite 400 Milwaukee, WI 53202 4 Telephone: 414-220-9211 Facsimile: 414-220-9214 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 Craig Chaquico 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 CRAIG CHAQUICO, Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 3:17-cv-02423- VC PROPOSED ORDER RE STIPULATION ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE vs. 14 Trial Date: DAVID FREIBERG, an Individual; DONNY 15 BALDWIN, an Individual; CHRIS SMITH, an Individual; JUDE GOLD, an Individual; 16 CATHERINE RICHARDSON, an Individual, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Based on the Stipulation of counsel, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the summary 20 judgment briefing schedule shall be as follows: 21 1. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, together with supporting documents, is 22 due on or before November 21, 2018. 23 24 2. Defendants’ opposition/motion for summary judgment with supporting documents, are due on or before December 13, 2018. 25 26 27 3. Plaintiff’s response to defendants’ opposition/motion for summary judgment with supporting documents is due on or before December 27, 2018. 28 3:17-cv-02423- VC Proposed Order Re Stipulation on Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule 1 4. Defendants’ response brief is due on or before January 10, 2019. 2 3 S UNIT ED 6 7 12 ER br ia FO e Chha LI inc J u d ge V H 11 RT 10 Date: November 2, 2018 NO 9 TED GRAN A 8 RT U O 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 4 N F D IS T IC T O R C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Proposed Order Re Stipulation on Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule 3:17-cv-02423-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?