Craig Ogans v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al

Filing 26

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this cause, it is ordered that, in lieu of the order to show cause requested by plaintiff, the claims alleged against defendant herein be dismiss ed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within forty-five days, with proof of service of a copy thereof on the opposing party, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been deliv ered, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 07/18/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CRAIG OGANS, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 17-cv-02443-MMC 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff having advised the Court that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, in lieu of the order to show cause requested by 16 plaintiff, the claims alleged against defendant herein be dismissed without prejudice; 17 provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within forty-five days, 18 with proof of service of a copy thereof on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration 19 for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated 20 and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as 21 appropriate. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 18, 2017 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?