Ke v. Brown

Filing 9

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 6/19/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HUI LIAN KE, Petitioner, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Case No. 17-cv-02464-SK (PR) v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Governor, ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Respondent. Petitioner, a detainee at the Santa Clara County Jail, Elmwood Facility, filed a pro se one- 13 page pleading entitled “Habeas Corpus.” The pleading was filed a new habeas action and assigned 14 to the undersigned. 15 On May 3, 2017, the court advised petitioner that her habeas action was deficient because 16 it was not submitted on the proper form, and sent her a blank copy of the court’s petition for a writ 17 of habeas corpus form. The court warned petitioner that, “[i]f you do not submit a completed . . . 18 petition on the proper form -- noting the above-referenced case number -- within 28 DAYS . . ., 19 your action will be DISMISSED and the filed closed.” ECF No. 4 at 1. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 More than 42 days elapsed; however, petitioner has not submitted the requisite completed petition form or sought an extension of time to do so. The action accordingly is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk is instructed to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 19, 2017 ______________________________________ SALLIE KIM United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?