Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO v. Security Paving Company, Inc.

Filing 25

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Dismissal [FED. R. CIV. PRO. 41(A)] filed by Security Paving Company, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 15, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2017)

Download PDF
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL UNION NO. 3, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, AFL-CIO, an unincorporated association, Plaintiff, 14 Case No.: 3: 17-cv-02492-JST JPROPOSEDl ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPOLATION OF DISMISSAL [FED. R. CIV. PRO. 41(A)] 15 v. Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar 16 SECURITYPAVINGCOMPANY, INC., Case Management Conference Hearing Date: 17 Defendant. 18 Date: January 3, 2017 2018 Crtrm: 10 9 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3, International Union of 23 Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO and Defendant Security Paving Company, Inc. 24 ( collectively 25 pursuant to FED. R. CIV. PROC. 41 (A) (the "Stipulation"). the "Parties") filed their Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of the action 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL fFED. R. CIV. PRO. 4l(A)] The Court finds good cause for granting the Parties' Stipulation. It is hereby 2 ordered that: 3 4 (1) Plaintiffs Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety; 5 (2) Defendant's Counter-Petition shall be dismissed with prejudice in its 6 7 entirety; (3) The Parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs of suit herein. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 December 15, 2017 DATED: - - - - - - Hon. Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL fFED. R. CIV. PRO. 4l(A)]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?