Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO v. Security Paving Company, Inc.
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Dismissal [FED. R. CIV. PRO. 41(A)] filed by Security Paving Company, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 15, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2017)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL
UNION NO. 3, INTERNATIONAL
UNION OF OPERATING
ENGINEERS, AFL-CIO, an
unincorporated association,
Plaintiff,
14
Case No.: 3: 17-cv-02492-JST
JPROPOSEDl ORDER REGARDING
JOINT STIPOLATION OF
DISMISSAL [FED. R. CIV. PRO.
41(A)]
15
v.
Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar
16
SECURITYPAVINGCOMPANY,
INC.,
Case Management Conference Hearing
Date:
17
Defendant.
18
Date: January 3, 2017 2018
Crtrm: 10 9
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3, International Union of
23
Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO and Defendant Security Paving Company, Inc.
24
( collectively
25
pursuant to FED. R. CIV. PROC. 41 (A) (the "Stipulation").
the "Parties") filed their Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of the action
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
fFED. R. CIV. PRO. 4l(A)]
The Court finds good cause for granting the Parties' Stipulation. It is hereby
2
ordered that:
3
4
(1)
Plaintiffs Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety;
5
(2)
Defendant's Counter-Petition shall be dismissed with prejudice in its
6
7
entirety;
(3)
The Parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs of suit herein.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
13
December 15, 2017
DATED: - - - - - -
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
fFED. R. CIV. PRO. 4l(A)]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?