Cooks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND. The July 14, 2017 hearing on plaintiff's motion is vacated. Defendant's request to appear telephonically is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 07/10/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2017)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 17-cv-02539-MMC
Before the Court is plaintiff Linda Cooks' (“Cooks”) Motion for Remand, filed May
17, 2017. On May 31, 2017, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo, N.A.”)
filed opposition,1 and on June 7, 2017, Cooks filed a reply, after which, on June 29, 2017,
with leave of Court, Wells Fargo, N.A. filed a surreply. Having read and considered the
papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter
appropriate for determination on the parties’ respective written submissions, and hereby
VACATES the hearing scheduled for July 14, 2017.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 10, 2017
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
The other two defendants, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and Wells Fargo &
Company, have not appeared.
In light thereof, Wells Fargo, NA.’s Request to Appear Telephonically at [the]
Hearing is DENIED as moot. For future reference, Wells Fargo, N.A. is advised that the
Court does not conduct telephonic hearings on contested motions.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?