Mason v. MediFit Corporate Services, Inc., et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by MediFit Corporate Services, Inc. dba EXOS filed by MediFit Corporate Services, Inc. dba EXOS. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 11, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2017)

Download PDF
Case 3:17-cv-02542-JST Document 38 Filed 08/10/17 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHEILA MASON CASE No ■ - 17-CV-02542-JST Plaintiff(s) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS v. MEDIFIT, a foreign corporation, et. Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 11 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice ofNeedfor ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. IS Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 0 Private ADR {specify process and provider) The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 0 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered.) S other requested deadline: 120 DAYS Date: August 9, 2017 Date: August 10,2017 z TLU-JL L/ Attorney for Plaintiff ‘AdSmey<lbrfJefendant XX□ IT IS SO ORDERED □ IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: AAugust 11, 2017 ---------U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-fde this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation " or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE " or “Stipulation. & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR."_____________________________ ________ ;--------------------- _--------------Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?