Mason v. MediFit Corporate Services, Inc., et al
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by MediFit Corporate Services, Inc. dba EXOS filed by MediFit Corporate Services, Inc. dba EXOS. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 11, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2017)
Case 3:17-cv-02542-JST Document 38 Filed 08/10/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SHEILA MASON
CASE No ■ - 17-CV-02542-JST
Plaintiff(s)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
v.
MEDIFIT, a foreign corporation, et.
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
11 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice ofNeedfor
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
IS Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
0 Private ADR {specify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
0 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered.)
S other requested deadline: 120 DAYS
Date: August 9, 2017
Date: August 10,2017
z
TLU-JL
L/
Attorney for Plaintiff
‘AdSmey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?