Boards of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 104 Health Care Trust et al v. Schneider Electric Buildings Americas, Inc.
Filing
31
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 30 FOR FURTHER CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, AND DEADLINE TO SELECT ADR PROCESS AND FILE ADR STIPULATIONS. Case Management Statement due by 3/1/2018. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 12/21/2017 continued to 3/8/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/8/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Kathleen Cahill Slaught (SBN 168129)
E-mail: kslaught@seyfarth.com
Michelle Scannell (SBN 267767)
E-mail: mscannell@seyfarth.com
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
(415) 397-2823
Facsimile:
(415) 397-8549
FRANCZEK RADELET
William R. Pokorny (pro hac vice)
Daniel R. Salemi (pro hac vice)
300 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 3400
Chicago IL 60606
Telephone: (312) 786-6141
Facsimile: (312) 986-9192
Attorneys for Defendant
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC BUILDINGS AMERICAS, INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SHEET
METAL WORKERS LOCAL 104 HEALTH
CARE TRUST;
SHEET METAL WORKERS PENSION TRUST
OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA;
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 104
SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION FUND;
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 104
VACATION-HOLIDAY SAVINGS FUND;
Case No. 3:17-cv-02567-RS
STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER
CONTINUANCE OF CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,
DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, AND
DEADLINE TO SELECT ADR PROCESS
AND FILE ADR STIPULATIONS
AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT
Complaint Filed: May 4, 2017
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 104 AND
BAY AREA INDUSTRY TRAINING FUND;
RICK WERNER, TRUSTEE; and
SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL
ASSOCIATION LOCAL UNION 104,
Plaintiffs,
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER CONTINUANCE OF CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, AND
DEADLINE TO SELECT ADR PROCESS AND FILE ADR STIPULATIONS
1
v.
2
3
4
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC BUILDINGS
AMERICAS, INC., a Delaware corporation.,
Defendant.
5
6
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, and 16-2(e), and ADR Local Rule 3-5,
7
Plaintiffs BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 104 HEALTH
8
CARE TRUST; SHEET METAL WORKERS PENSION TRUST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA;
9
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 104 SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION FUND; SHEET METAL
10
WORKERS LOCAL 104 VACATION-HOLIDAY SAVINGS FUND; SHEET METAL WORKERS
11
LOCAL 104 AND BAY AREA INDUSTRY TRAINING FUND; RICK WERNER, TRUSTEE; and
12
SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION LOCAL UNION 104,
13
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC BUILDINGS AMERICAS, INC.
14
(“Defendant”) (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their counsel, HEREBY STIPULATE AND
15
AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
16
WHEREAS, presently, the deadline for the parties to select an ADR process or file a notice of
17
need for ADR phone conference was December 5, 2017. The deadline for Defendant to respond to
18
Plaintiffs’ Complaint is December 15, 2017, and an initial Case Management Conference is scheduled
19
for December 21, 2017.
20
WHEREAS, the Parties are in the process of negotiating a potential resolution to this action.
21
Due to the fact that the negotiation and settlement process requires input from Plaintiff’s Board of
22
Trustees and to other scheduling difficulties, the negotiation of a potential settlement and
23
accompanying paperwork is not yet complete. A few weeks ago, Plaintiffs presented to Defendant a
24
proposed declaration as part of Plaintiffs’ settlement proposal, which at this time is under consideration
25
with Defendant. The Parties are working diligently and in good faith to complete a settlement, and
26
hope to reach an agreement within the next sixty days. In the interest of conserving judicial and party
27
resources while the Parties continue to attempt to settle this matter, the Parties respectfully request that
28
2
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE, DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, AND DEADLINE TO SELECT
ADR PROCESS AND FILE ADR STIPULATIONS
1
the Court issue a 60-day continuance of all deadlines in this matter, as set forth below. If the Parties
2
reach an agreement within the next 60 days, the Parties will promptly notify the Court.
3
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-2(a)(2), the Parties provide that pursuant to prior
4
requests, the Court has previously granted continuances in this matter. On August 24, 2017, the Court
5
ordered that the CMC was continued to October 26, 2017. On October 6, 2017, the Court extended the
6
deadline for the parties to select an ADR process or file a notice of need for ADR phone conference, to
7
December 5, 2017. On October 11, 2017, the Court continued the deadline for Defendant to respond to
8
the Complaint to December 15, 2017, and continued the CMC to December 21, 2017.
9
10
11
12
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that the Court extend present deadlines as
follows:
February 5, 2018: Deadline for the parties to select an ADR process of file a notice of need for
ADR conference;
13
February 15, 2018: Deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint; and
14
February 22, 2018: Case Management Conference.
15
All other related deadlines shall be continued accordingly.
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
17
18
DATED: December 7, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
19
20
21
22
23
By:
/s/ Michelle M. Scannell
Kathleen Cahill Slaught
Michelle Scannell
Attorneys for Defendant
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC BUILDINGS AMERICAS,
INC.
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE, DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, AND DEADLINE TO SELECT
ADR PROCESS AND FILE ADR STIPULATIONS
1
DATED: December 7, 2017
2
Respectfully submitted,
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
3
4
By:
/s/ Michele R. Stafford
Michele R. Stafford
Matthew P. Minser
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SHEET METAL
WORKERS LOCAL 104 HEALTH CARE TRUST;
SHEET METAL WORKERS PENSION TRUST OF
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; SHEET METAL
WORKERS LOCAL 104 SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION
FUND; SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 104
VACATION-HOLIDAY SAVINGS FUND; SHEET
METAL WORKERS LOCAL 104 AND BAY AREA
INDUSTRY TRAINING FUND; RICK WERNER,
TRUSTEE; and SHEET METAL WORKERS
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION LOCAL UNION
104
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
14
The filer of this stipulation, Michelle Scannell, attests that concurrence in the filing of this
15
document has been obtained from counsel for Plaintiffs.
16
DATED: December 7, 2017
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
17
By:
/s/ Michelle M. Scannell
Kathleen Cahill Slaught
Michelle Scannell
Attorneys for Defendant
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC BUILDINGS
AMERICAS, INC.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE, DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, AND DEADLINE TO SELECT
ADR PROCESS AND FILE ADR STIPULATIONS
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, the Court grants the Parties’
3
4
5
Stipulated Request and sets the following deadlines in this matter:
February 5, 2018: Deadline for the parties to select an ADR process of file a notice of need for
ADR conference;
7
February 15, 2018: Deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint; and
March 8, 2018
February 22, 2018, 10:00 a.m.: Case Management Conference.
8
All other related deadlines shall be continued accordingly.
6
9
10
DATED: 12/8/17
District Judge Richard Seeborg
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
5
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE, DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, AND DEADLINE TO SELECT
ADR PROCESS AND FILE ADR STIPULATIONS
42891984v.1 / 057434-000056
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?