HERNANDEZ et al v. QBE Insurance Corporation et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 28 TO EXTEND TIME TO MEET AND CONFER AND FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE CMC filed by Jose Ramon Hernandez, Leah Ann Hernandez. Case Management Statement due by 11/14/2017. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/21/2017 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/19/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Ethan A. Glaubiger, California State Bar #157485 LAW OFFICES OF ETHAN A. GLAUBIGER 740 Fourth Street, 2nd Floor Santa Rosa, California 95404 (707) 578-4505 Attorney for Plaintiffs LEAH ANN HERNANDEZ and JOSE RAMON HERNANDEZ 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 OF ETHAN A. GLAUBIGER LAW OFFICES 740 Fourth Street, 2nd Floor, Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Tel: (707) 578-4505 Fax: (707) 578-0409 9 10 11 12 Case No: 3:17-cv-02577 LEAH ANN HERNANDEZ and JOSE RAMON HERNANDEZ, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO EXCHANGE INFORMATION AND FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, vs. 13 14 15 16 QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION, QBE AMERICAS, INC., and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 17 18 19 Come now, Plaintiffs LEAH ANN HERNANDEZ and JOSE RAMON 20 HERNANDEZ (“Hernandez”) and defendants QBE PRAETORIAN INSURANCE 21 CORPORATION AND QBE AMERICAS, INC. (“QBE”) and stipulate as follows. 22 On July 13, 2017, the parties appeared before the court on QBE’s Motion to Dismiss 23 and Motion to Strike. The court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with 60 days leave 24 to amend and deemed moot the Motion to Strike . The court also ordered the parties to meet 25 and confer to review policy and documents thoroughly before Plaintiffs filed an amended 26 complaint, which was due by September 11, 2017. Lastly, the court reset the Case 27 Management Conference (“CMC”) from August 31, 2017 to October 26, 2017 and ordered 28 the parties to file a joint CMC statement by October 19, 2017. 1 4812-9451-9887.1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time to Exchange Information and File Amended Complaint 1 On August 7, 2017 counsel began their meet and confer. The parties agreed to 2 exchange identified documents. Among other things, Plaintiff agreed to produce files from 3 their lender, Umpqua Bank (“Umpqua”). On August 9, 2017, defense counsel confirmed the 4 agreement by email and asked Plaintiffs’ counsel to contact him to finalize details of the 5 document exchange. 6 In reviewing the files in Hernandez’s counsel’s possession, plaintiffs’ counsel OF ETHAN A. GLAUBIGER never responded. On September 6, Plaintiffs’ counsel advised defense counsel that he did 9 LAW OFFICES realized that, although, in 2016, a request was made to Umpqua for its records, Umpqua 8 740 Fourth Street, 2nd Floor, Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Tel: (707) 578-4505 Fax: (707) 578-0409 7 not have those key documents but had renewed his request to obtain them. On September 8, 10 2017, defense counsel suggested in a voice mail that the parties exchange the documents 11 they did have and that Plaintiffs’ counsel agree to produce the complete Umpqua Bank file 12 upon his receipt without need for formal discovery. On Monday, September 11, Plaintiffs’ 13 counsel agreed to the proposal, and requested that the defense stipulate to extend the 14 deadlines for the meet and confer/document exchange, the filing of the First Amended 15 Complaint and the CMC. Plaintiffs’ counsel also represented that he expected to have the 16 Umpqua file by the third week of September. 17 Plaintiff’s counsel represents that, in late August 2017, upon learning about the lack 18 of response, plaintiffs’ counsel’s office renewed efforts to obtain Umpqua’s records. 19 Ultimately, Umpqua responded in early September 2017 that it would be providing records 20 by the second or third week of September. 21 Umpqua’s records are relevant to the amended complaint in that Plaintiffs contend 22 Umpqua maintained an impound account and further contend that Umpqua made payments 23 to one or the other of the Defendants for insurance on the property lost in the fire. 24 Defendant QBE Insurance Corporation alleges that it sent cancellation notices to both the 25 Plaintiffs and to Umpqua before the Valley Fire in Lake County. The Plaintiffs allege that 26 they never received the cancellation notice and that Umpqua continued impounding money 27 for the property insurance. Further, according to Plaintiffs, it was not until after the Valley 28 2 4812-9451-9887.1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time to Exchange Information and File Amended Complaint 1 Fire loss that Umpqua took steps to obtain replacement insurance raising the issue as to 2 whether Umpqua received the cancellation notice defendant alleges it sent. 3 Complicating matters on Plaintiffs’ side is the fact that Plaintiffs’ counsel’s assistant 4 for the last six years left in July 2017 to work for her husband. Since that time, Plaintiffs’ 5 counsel has had three replacements, two of whom did not work out. The flux created by the 6 loss of Plaintiffs’ counsel’s assistant contributed to the delay in obtaining the records. 7 As set forth above, on September 11, 2017, Plaintiffs’ counsel agreed to the OF ETHAN A. GLAUBIGER LAW OFFICES defense’s September 8 proposal, to wit that each side would exchange documents in their 9 740 Fourth Street, 2nd Floor, Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Tel: (707) 578-4505 Fax: (707) 578-0409 8 possession and Plaintiffs’ counsel would provide the Umpqua records upon his receipt. 10 Because of the delay in securing the Umpqua file and exchanging information, both 11 of which are necessary to meaningfully meet and confer and consider how to amend the 12 complaint, Plaintiffs have not filed their First Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs’ counsel 13 believes that information in the Umpqua file is necessary for amending the complaint. 14 Therefore, it is requested that the deadline to exchange documents, including the 15 Umpqua records, be continued to September 22, 2017, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a 16 First Amended Complaint be continued to October 2, 2017 and the CMC be continued to a 17 date convenient to the Court roughly 45 days later. Defendants’ responsive pleadings will 18 be filed pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 4812-9451-9887.1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time to Exchange Information and File Amended Complaint 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 DATED: September 12, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF ETHAN A. GLAUBIGER 4 5 6 By: 7 Ethan A. Glaubiger Attorneys for Plaintiffs LEAH ANN HERNANDEZ AND RAMON HERNANDEZ 8 OF ETHAN A. GLAUBIGER LAW OFFICES 740 Fourth Street, 2nd Floor, Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Tel: (707) 578-4505 Fax: (707) 578-0409 9 10 DATED: September 12, 2017 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 11 12 By: Jerry Garcia Rebecca R. Weinreich Jerry Garcia Attorneys for Defendants QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION, QBE AMERICAS, INC. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 4812-9451-9887.1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time to Exchange Information and File Amended Complaint [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 In accordance with the above stipulation, and for good cause shown, it is hereby 4 ordered that plaintiffs shall have leave to file an amended complaint on or before October 2, pursuant to FRCP. 2017. Responsive pleadings shall be filed not later than _______, 2017. 5 11/21 The case management conference shall be continued to __________, 2017 at 10:30 _______ a.m./p.m. 12 DIFIED AS MO 13 14 hen rd M. C dwa Judge E ER N F D IS T IC T O R 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 4812-9451-9887.1 R NIA IT H OF ETHAN A. GLAUBIGER 11 RT LAW OFFICES 10 NO 740 Fourth Street, 2nd Floor, Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Tel: (707) 578-4505 Fax: (707) 578-0409 9 Hon. Edward M. Chen Judge of the UnitedRED District States Court, NorthernDE O OR District of California IS S FO UNIT ED 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 7 LI 6 A 3 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time to Exchange Information and File Amended Complaint C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?