X.Commerce, Inc. v. Express Mobile, Inc.
Filing
262
ORDER RE PENDING MOTIONS (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2022)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
In re EXPRESS MOBILE CASES
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Case Nos. 3:17-cv-02605-RS
3:19-cv-06559-RS
3:20-cv-06152-RS
3:20-cv-08297-RS
3:20-cv-08321-RS
3:20-cv-08335-RS
3:20-cv-08339-RS
3:20-cv-08461-RS
3:20-cv-08492-RS
3:21-cv-01145-RS
3:21-cv-02001-RS
3:21-cv-06656-RS
3:21-cv-06657-RS
3:21-cv-08942-RS
3:21-cv-08944-RS
ORDER RE PENDING MOTIONS
20
21
22
23
24
By various orders, these actions have all been stayed pending IPR proceedings initiated by
defendant Meta.1 The several submitted motions to dismiss, the submitted and upcoming motions
for leave to amend infringement contentions, and the submitted claims construction motions will
25
26
1
27
28
To the extent the status of the continued stay in Case 3:17-cv-02605-RS may have been
uncertain, it shall now be stayed with the other cases.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
1
all be denied, without prejudice, during the pendency of the stays. If and when the stays are lifted,
2
the parties to the motions shall meet and confer to attempt to agree on schedules and page limits
3
for any supplementary briefing that may be appropriate for each motion in light of the outcomes at
4
the PTO and/or any other factual or legal developments during the passage of time.
5
Parties may elect to re-brief motions completely, in which case the default page limits and
6
timing shall apply, or they may file abbreviated supplements, preferably under 10 pages per side,
7
with no reply. If parties submit such abbreviated supplements for a particular motion, it will then
8
be taken under submission or set for hearing, in the court’s discretion. Similarly, if with respect to
9
any particular motion the parties agree no additional briefing is warranted, they may file a
10
statement to that effect and the matter will then be taken under submission or set for hearing, in
11
the court’s discretion.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
17
Dated: July 26, 2022
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
Chief United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?