Dyer v. Pearce et al
Filing
38
ORDER by Judge James Donato denying 37 Motion to Amend/Correct. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JEWEL E. DYER,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND
v.
TIMOTHY PEARCE, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 37
Defendants.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 17-cv-02640-JD
12
13
This case was dismissed and closed at screening on June 29, 2018. The Court revoked
14
plaintiff’s informa pauperis status on appeal and the Ninth Circuit later dismissed the appeal as
15
frivolous. Docket No. 34. Plaintiff now seeks leave to file an amended complaint. Because the
16
appeal has already been denied as frivolous plaintiff’s motion to amend (Docket No. 37) is
17
DENIED.
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 13, 2019
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
JEWEL E. DYER,
Case No. 17-cv-02640-JD
Plaintiff,
5
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
6
7
TIMOTHY PEARCE, et al.,
Defendants.
8
9
10
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
That on March 13, 2019, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
Jewel E. Dyer ID: A#20559
Mendocino County Jail
951 Low Gap Road
Ukiah, CA 95482
19
20
21
Dated: March 13, 2019
22
23
Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court
24
25
26
27
By:________________________
LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable JAMES DONATO
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?