Davis v. Combined Insurance
Filing
33
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; AFFORDING LEAVE TO AMEND; VACATING HEARING DATE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 01/10/2018. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
KEITH DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Case No. 17-cv-02655-MMC
v.
COMBINED INSURANCE,
Defendant.
14
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S
MOTION TO DISMISS; AFFORDING
LEAVE TO AMEND; VACATING
HEARING DATE
Re: Dkt. No. 17
15
16
Before the Court is defendant Combined Insurance’s motion, filed November 17,
17
2017, to dismiss plaintiff Keith Davis’s First Amended Complaint, in which plaintiff alleges
18
a single cause of action for breach of contract by reason of defendant’s failure to pay
19
benefits upon the death of plaintiff’s son. Plaintiff has filed opposition, to which defendant
20
has replied. The Court, having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in
21
opposition to the motion, finds the insurance policy at issue does not afford death
22
benefits.
23
Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and, in light of
24
plaintiff’s assertion in his opposition that he purchased the policy in reliance on
25
representations made by defendant’s agent, plaintiff is hereby afforded leave to amend to
26
plead, if he can do so, a claim based on such representations.
27
28
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, if any, shall be filed no later than January
26, 2018.
1
2
3
In light of the above, the hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss, scheduled for
January 26, 2018, is hereby VACATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: January 10, 2018
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?