Regan v. Berryhill
Filing
21
JUDGMENT: The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and DENIES Defendants motion for summary judgment, and remands the case for further administrative proceedings to reconsider the issue of Plaintiffs credibility as to the intensity, persistence, and limiting effects of her symptoms, as well as Plaintiffs husbands written testimony., ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/28/2018. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JULIE EMMA REGAN,
Case No. 17-cv-02658-EDL
Plaintiff,
8
v.
JUDGMENT
9
10
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
This action came before the Court, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte presiding, and
the issues have been duly heard and considered and a decision having been fully rendered,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that in accordance with the Court’s Order of March
28, 2018, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 28, 2018
______________________________________
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?