Scott Crawford et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 107

STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE FACT DISCOVERY AND ENTER PROTECTIVE ORDER IN RELATED CASES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/17/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Anne Marie Estevez (pro hac vice) 200 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 5300 Miami, FL 33131 T: 305.415.3000 F: 305.415.3001 annemarie.estevez@morganlewis.com Stephanie Schuster (pro hac vice) Patrick Harvey (pro hac vice) Clara Kollm (pro hac vice) 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 T: 202.739.3000 F: 202.739.3001 stephanie.schuster@morganlewis.com patrick.harvey@morganlewis.com clara.kollm@morganlewis.com 10 13 Kathy H. Gao (CA Bar No. 259019) 300 South Grand Avenue, 22nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 T: 213.612.2500 F: 213.612.2501 kathy.gao@morganlewis.com 14 Attorneys for Defendants 11 12 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 18 SCOTT CRAWFORD and JARVIS JERNIGAN, JR., Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 22 23 Case No. 3:17-cv-02664-RS STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE FACT DISCOVERY AND ENTER PROTECTIVE ORDER IN RELATED CASES v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER, LLC, Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg Defendants. STEPHAN NAMISNAK and FRANCIS FALLS, Case No. 3:17-cv-06124-RS 24 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE FACT DISCOVERY AND ENTER PROTECTIVE ORDER IN RELATED CASES 25 v. 26 27 28 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER, LLC, Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg Defendants. Case No. 3:17-cv-02664-RS 1 1 Plaintiffs Scott Crawford and Jarvis Jernigan, Jr. (“Crawford Plaintiffs”), Plaintiffs 2 Stephan Namisnak and Francis Falls (“Namisnak Plaintiffs”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and 3 Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC (“Defendants”) (together, with Plaintiffs, 4 the “Parties”), through counsel, hereby submit this Stipulation to Consolidate Fact Discovery and 5 Enter Protective Order in the captioned actions, and jointly move this court to so order. 6 1. WHEREAS, the Crawford Plaintiffs commenced the action styled Crawford v. 7 Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 3:17-cv-02664-RS (N.D. Cal.), on May 9, 2017 (“Crawford 8 Action”); 9 2. WHEREAS, the Namisnak Plaintiffs, along with Mitchell Miraglia, commenced 10 the action styled Namisnak v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 3:17-cv-06124-RS (N.D. Cal.), on 11 October 26, 2017 (“Namisnak Action”). On May 8, 2018, the Namisnak Plaintiffs filed a First 12 Amended Complaint, to which Mr. Miraglia is not a party. Namisnak, ECF No. 54. 13 3. WHEREAS, by order dated November 14, 2017, this Court deemed the Crawford 14 Action and the Namisnak Action as related cases under Civil Local Rule 3-12(a). Crawford, 15 ECF No. 58; Namisnak, ECF No. 24. 16 4. WHEREFORE, the Parties have conferred and agreed that consolidating fact 17 discovery in the Crawford Action and the Namisnak Action, in the manner set forth in Appendix 18 A, would serve the purposes of Civil Local Rule 3-12 and allow fact discovery to proceed in a 19 manner that is most efficient for the Parties and the Court. The Parties have further conferred 20 and agreed that entry of the Protective Order attached as Appendix B in the Crawford Action, 21 and entry of the Protective Order attached as Appendix C in the Namisnak Action will and is 22 necessary to facilitate consolidated fact discovery. 23 24 [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:17-cv-02664-RS 2 1 Dated: June 15, 2018, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 2 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 3 By s/ Anne Marie Estevez Anne Marie Estevez Stephanie Schuster Patrick Harvey Clara Kollm Kathy H. Gao 4 5 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 8 9 Dated: June 15, 2018, 2018 10 11 12 13 s/ William Most William Most (CA # 279100) AQUA TERRA AERIS LAW GROUP 828 San Pablo Ave., Ste. 115B Albany, CA 94706 T: (504) 509-5023 williammost@gmail.com s/ Garret S. DeRues Garret S. DeReus (LA # 35105) (pro hac vice) BIZER & DEREUS, LLC 3319 St. Claude Ave. New Orleans, LA 70117 T: 504-619-9999; F: 504-948-9996 gdereus@bizerlaw.com 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff 18 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: ____________, 2018 7/17 23 HON. RICHARD SEEBORG 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:17-cv-02664-RS 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?