Scott Crawford et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
97
Discovery Order. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/18/2018. (mejlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SCOTT CRAWFORD, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
DISCOVERY ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 96
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
11
Pending before the Court is the parties’ focused Joint Letter Brief regarding three terms in
12
13
Case No. 17-cv-02664-RS (MEJ)
a proposed protective order. Ltr. Br., Dkt. No. 96. The Court rules as follows:
Issue I: The parties may designate material as Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only
14
15
or Highly Confidential – Source Code. If the opposing party challenges the designation, the
16
parties shall meet and confer regarding specific documents at issue. The parties are excused from
17
the in-person meet and confer requirement, but must confer in good faith at least by telephone, and
18
may not simply exchange their positions in writing. The parties may bring specific disputes to the
19
undersigned by joint letter brief if they cannot resolve their disputes by meeting and conferring.
20
21
Issue II: The undersigned finds no basis for departing from the standard model protective
order.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Issue III: The undersigned finds no basis for departing from the standard model protective
order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 18, 2018
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?