Scott Crawford et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 97

Discovery Order. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/18/2018. (mejlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SCOTT CRAWFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 96 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. 11 Pending before the Court is the parties’ focused Joint Letter Brief regarding three terms in 12 13 Case No. 17-cv-02664-RS (MEJ) a proposed protective order. Ltr. Br., Dkt. No. 96. The Court rules as follows: Issue I: The parties may designate material as Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only 14 15 or Highly Confidential – Source Code. If the opposing party challenges the designation, the 16 parties shall meet and confer regarding specific documents at issue. The parties are excused from 17 the in-person meet and confer requirement, but must confer in good faith at least by telephone, and 18 may not simply exchange their positions in writing. The parties may bring specific disputes to the 19 undersigned by joint letter brief if they cannot resolve their disputes by meeting and conferring. 20 21 Issue II: The undersigned finds no basis for departing from the standard model protective order. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Issue III: The undersigned finds no basis for departing from the standard model protective order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 18, 2018 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?