Zayas v. State of California et al

Filing 68

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen denying 67 Plaintiff's Administrative Motion for Leave to Submit Additional Briefing. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ESTRELLA LYSANDRA ZAYAS, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 17-cv-02739-EMC v. JOSE ORTEGA, et al., Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL BRIEFING Docket No. 67 12 13 Plaintiff has asked for leave to file a supplemental brief to discuss a Ninth Circuit decision 14 issued after the summary judgment reply briefs were filed. See Shorter v. Baca, No. 16-56051, 15 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 19491 (9th Cir. July 16, 2018). Plaintiff’s motion is denied. Under Civil 16 Local Rule 7-3(d), “[o]nce a reply is filed, no additional memoranda, papers or letters may be filed 17 without prior Court approval, except,” e.g., “[b]efore the noticed hearing date, counsel may bring 18 to the Court’s attention a relevant judicial opinion published after the date the opposition or reply 19 was filed by filing and serving a Statement of Recent Decision, containing a citation to and 20 providing a copy of the new opinion – without argument.” Civ. L.R. 7-3(d). The Court therefore 21 shall not permit Plaintiff to file a supplemental brief. However, it shall take into account the 22 Shorter decision cited by Plaintiff. 23 This order disposes of Docket No. 67. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: July 24, 2018 26 27 28 ______________________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?