United States of America v. Sweet et al
Filing
41
ORDER RE: BANKRUPTCY STAY. The court generally closes cases administratively that are stayed because of a bankruptcy filing because there is no reason to maintain the file as an open case for statistical purposes. The court thus administratively closes the file. This order is not a dismissal or disposition of this action, and if further proceedings become necessary, any party may initiate them in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. The court also asks for an update about the bankruptcy by March 8, 2018. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/18/2017. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
San Francisco Division
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
v.
12
13
Case No. 17-cv-02750-LB
Plaintiff,
11
ORDER RE: BANKRUPTCY STAY
LYNETTE E. SWEET, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 40
Defendants.
14
15
16
The court generally closes cases administratively that are stayed because of a bankruptcy filing
17
because there is no reason to maintain the file as an open case for statistical purposes. The court
18
thus administratively closes the file. This order is not a dismissal or disposition of this action, and
19
if further proceedings become necessary, any party may initiate them in the same manner as if this
20
order had not been entered. The court also asks for an update about the bankruptcy by March 8,
21
2018.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
Dated: October 18, 2017
______________________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER (No.17-cv-02750-LB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?