United States of America v. Sweet et al

Filing 41

ORDER RE: BANKRUPTCY STAY. The court generally closes cases administratively that are stayed because of a bankruptcy filing because there is no reason to maintain the file as an open case for statistical purposes. The court thus administratively closes the file. This order is not a dismissal or disposition of this action, and if further proceedings become necessary, any party may initiate them in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. The court also asks for an update about the bankruptcy by March 8, 2018. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/18/2017. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 San Francisco Division 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States District Court Northern District of California v. 12 13 Case No. 17-cv-02750-LB Plaintiff, 11 ORDER RE: BANKRUPTCY STAY LYNETTE E. SWEET, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 40 Defendants. 14 15 16 The court generally closes cases administratively that are stayed because of a bankruptcy filing 17 because there is no reason to maintain the file as an open case for statistical purposes. The court 18 thus administratively closes the file. This order is not a dismissal or disposition of this action, and 19 if further proceedings become necessary, any party may initiate them in the same manner as if this 20 order had not been entered. The court also asks for an update about the bankruptcy by March 8, 21 2018. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: October 18, 2017 ______________________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER (No.17-cv-02750-LB)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?