Resolute Forest Products, Inc. et al v. Greenpeace International et al

Filing 153

ORDER re 150 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER to Supplement Briefing filed by Todd Paglia, ForestEthics. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 18, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS, INC.,
ET AL.,

7
8

Plaintiffs,

9

v.

10

ORDER
Re: ECF No. 150

GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL, et al.,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No.17-cv-02824-JST

Defendants.

12
Having considered the stipulation filed by Plaintiffs and Defendant STAND, ECF No. 150,

13
14

the Court sets the following supplemental briefing schedule:1


15

Pending Motions on or before August 25, 2017; and

16


17

Plaintiffs may file a responsive brief no longer than ten pages on or before September 19,
2017.

18

The Court will not accept a reply brief.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

STAND may file one supplemental brief no longer than fifteen pages in support of the

Dated: August 18, 2017
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The Court acknowledges that it previously approved a similar supplemental briefing schedule
stipulated to by Plaintiffs and Defendant Greenpeace Fund, Inc, which permitted replies and did
not contain page limits. ECF No. 149. In hindsight, the Court should have placed similar page
limits on that set of supplemental briefs. While the Court will not withdraw its prior order, it
encourages the parties to that stipulation to consider the limits set forth in this order as helpful
guidelines.