Resolute Forest Products, Inc. et al v. Greenpeace International et al

Filing 207

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 206 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Allow Plaintiffs To File A Consolidated Opposition To Defendants Motions To Dismiss And Strike The First Amended Complaint In Excess Of The Page Limit Imposed By Local Rule 7 -4 filed by Resolute FP Canada, Inc., Resolute FP US, Inc., Fibrek U.S., Inc., Fibrek General Partnership, Fibrek International, Inc., Resolute FP Augusta, LLC, Resolute Forest Products, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 20, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2018)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., et CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02824-JST
al.
Plaintiffs,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO ALLOW PLAINTIFFS
v.
TO FILE CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION
IN EXCESS OF 25 PAGES
GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL, et al.
Action Filed: May 31, 2016
Defendants.
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
Courtroom 9

10
11
Plaintiffs Resolute Forest Products, Inc., Resolute FP US, Inc., Resolute FP Augusta,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

LLC, Fibrek General Partnership, Fibrek U.S., Inc., Fibrek International, Inc., and Resolute FP
Canada, Inc., (collectively, “Resolute” or “Plaintiffs”), on the one hand, Defendants Greenpeace
International (aka Greenpeace Stichting Council) (“GPI”), Greenpeace, Inc., Daniel Brindis,
Amy Moas, Matthew Daggett, Rolf Skar and (collectively, the “Greenpeace Defendants”),
Defendant Greenpeace Fund, Inc. (“Greenpeace Fund”), and Defendants Todd Paglia and Stand,
formerly known as ForestEthics (collectively, “Stand”) (collectively “Defendants”), on the other
hand, through their respective counsel, have agreed and stipulated to an order allowing Resolute
to file a consolidated opposition to Defendants Motions to Dismiss and Strike Plaintiffs’ First
Amended Complaint, not to exceed 80 pages, and good cause appearing therefore,
[PROPOSED] ORDER

22

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Plaintiffs may file a consolidated opposition to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss and

24
25
26
27
28

Strike Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint that exceeds 25 pages but which shall not exceed 80
pages.
March 20, 2018
DATED: ______________________

_________________________
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
Case No. 3:17-CV-02824-JST

[PROPOSED] ORDER