Resolute Forest Products, Inc. et al v. Greenpeace International et al

Filing 212

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 211 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Permission for Defendants to Exceed Page Limits filed by Greenpeace International, Matthew Daggett, Amy Moas, Greenpeace, Inc., Rolf Skar, Daniel Brindis. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 7, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2018)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2
3
4
5
6

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS, INC.,
RESOLUTE FP US, INC., RESOLUTE FP
AUGUSTA, LLC, FIBREK GENERAL
PARTNERSHIP, FIBREK U.S., INC., FIBREK
INTERNATIONAL INC., and RESOLUTE FP
CANADA, INC.,
Plaintiffs,

7
8
9

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

10
11
12
13

Case No. 17-cv-02824-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Date:
Time:
Location: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor:

v.
GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL (aka
“GREENPEACE STICHTING COUNCIL”).
GREENPEACE, INC., GREENPEACE FUND,
INC., FORESTETHICS, DANIEL BRINDIS,
AMY MOAS, MATTHEW DAGGETT, ROLF
SKAR, TODD PAGLIA, and JOHN AND JANE
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
Defendant.

14
15

The Court has considered the parties’ Stipulation Regarding Defendants Filing Replies in

16

Support of Their Motions to Dismiss and/or Strike the Amended Complaint in Excess of the Page

17

Limit Imposed by Local Rule 7-4. For the reasons stated therein, the Stipulation is GRANTED and

18

the Greenpeace Defendants’ reply in support of its motion to dismiss and/or strike the Amended

19

Complaint may not exceed 30 pages; Greenpeace Fund’s reply in support of its motion to dismiss

20
and/or strike the Amended Complaint may not exceed 20 pages; and Stand’s reply in support of
21
22
23

its motion to dismiss and/or strike the Amended Complaint may not exceed 20 pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated: _____________, 2018
April 7

26
27
28

Order
Case No. 17-cv-02824-JST

By: ________________________________
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE