Resolute Forest Products, Inc. et al v. Greenpeace International et al
Filing
250
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR STAND AND TODD PAGLIA'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES as to 247 MOTION for Attorney's Fees and Costs Following Order Granting Anti-Slapp Motion to Strike. Responses due by 3/7/2019. Replies due by 3/14/2019. Motion Hearing set for 4/4/2019 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 9, 19th Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 13, 2019. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., et CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02824-JST
al.
Plaintiffs,
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
Courtroom 9
v.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL, et al.
STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR STAND AND TODD
Defendants.
PAGLIA’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S
FEES
Action Filed: May 31, 2016
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Resolute Forest Products, Inc., Resolute FP US, Inc., Resolute FP
2
Augusta, LLC, Fibrek General Partnership, Fibrek US, Inc., Fibrek International Inc., and
3
Resolute FP Canada, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Stand (formerly ForestEthics) and Todd
4
Paglia (together, “Stand Defendants”) have stipulated to a briefing schedule and hearing on Stand
5
Defendants’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (“Stand Defendants’ Motion”), and good
6
cause appearing therefore,
7
ORDER
8
9
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
2019;
12
13
14
Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to Stand Defendants’ Motion on or before March 7,
Stand Defendants shall file their reply in support of their Motion on or before March 14,
2019;
Oral argument on the Stand Defendants’ Motion will be held on April 4, 2019 at 2:00
p.m.
15
16
February 13, 2019
DATED: ______________________
_________________________
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?