McNealy v. YRC Worldwide, Inc. et al
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 14 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by YRC Freight, YRC Inc., YRC Worldwide, Inc. filed by YRC Worldwide, Inc., YRC Inc., YRC Freight. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 23, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT "
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA"
Case No. 3:17-cv-02841-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
YRC Worldwide, Inc., et al.
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process: "
" Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) "
" Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
" Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Date and private mediator to be agreed upon by
the parties after preliminary discovery.
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: "
X the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. ) "
" other requested deadline: "
Date: August 18, 2017
Date: August 18, 2017
s/Julianne Kira Stanford
Attorney for Plaintiff"
s/Sacha M. Steenhoek
Attorney for Defendant"
" IT IS SO ORDERED
" IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
Date: August 23, 2017
----------U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE"
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Private ADR.”
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?