Bankwitz et al v. Ecolab, Inc.,

Filing 50

MODIFIED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/16/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ALEJANDRO P. GUTIERREZ, Bar No. 107688 agutierrez@hathawaylawfirm.com HATHAWAY, PERRETT, WEBSTER, POWERS, CHRISMAN & GUTIERREZ, APC 5450 Telegraph Road, Suite 200 Ventura, CA 93006-3577 Tel: 805.644.7111│Fax: 805.644.8296 DANIEL J. PALAY, Bar No.159348 djp@calemploymentcounsel.com Brian D. Hefelfinger, Bar No. 253054 bdh@calemploymentcounsel.com PALAY HEFELFINGER, APC 1484 E. Main Street, Suite 105-B Ventura, CA 93001 Tel: 805.628.8220│Fax: 805.765.8600 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Class 10 13 JODY A. LANDRY, Bar No. 125743 jlandry@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway, Suite 900 San Diego, California 92101.3577 Tel: 619.232.0441│Fax: 619.232.4302 14 Attorneys for Defendant Ecolab Inc. 15 For All Other Attorneys, Please See Signature Page 11 12 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 ROBERT BANKWITZ, an individual, WILLIAM JACOBO, an individual, JOSHUA HERNANDEZ, an individual, 24 25 MODIFIED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiffs, 22 23 Case No. 3:17-cv-02924-EMC v. ECOLAB, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 Plaintiffs Robert Bankwitz, William Jacobo, and Joshua Hernandez (“Plaintiffs”) and 2 Defendant Ecolab, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of record, submit this 3 stipulation for a protective order and agree to the following: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Good Cause Statement 1. Plaintiffs’ allegations may require disclosure of private and/or confidential information regarding Defendant’s current and/or former employees, including contact information. In addition, the parties expect that Plaintiffs may request and Defendant may need to produce confidential business information involving Defendant’s business policies and practices that would likely cause significant harm to Defendant if made available or accessible publicly or to Defendant’s competitors. Good cause therefore exists for the issuance of this protective order, as the protective order will allow the parties to engage in discovery in this lawsuit while providing a means for limiting access to, and disclosure of, private, confidential and/or trade secret information. The purpose of this protective order is to protect the confidentiality of such materials as much as practicable during the litigation. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Definitions And Designation 2. “Confidential Information” means any information contained in any paper, document, database, spreadsheet, video recording, audio recording, electronic record or any other electronic or hard copy format received in this action that is stamped with a “Confidential” designation. Confidential Information may include, but is not limited to: (a) confidential or sensitive company proprietary business information and (b) information about current, past or prospective employees that is of a confidential or private nature, including current or former employees’ names and contact information. 3. “Attorneys Eyes Only Material” means any information contained in any paper, document, database, spreadsheet, video recording, audio recording, electronic record or any other electronic or hard copy format received in this action that is stamped with an “Attorneys Eyes Only” designation. Attorneys Eyes Only Material may include, but is not limited to: highly confidential or 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 sensitive business information that could cause financial harm to Defendant if disseminated to the 2 public or competitors. 3 4. Any party may designate any material produced by that party in this action as 4 “Confidential” or “Attorneys Eyes Only” where he, she, or it believes in good faith that such 5 material qualifies for that designation as defined above. Marking or stamping “Confidential” or 6 “Attorneys Eyes Only” on the cover of a multiple page document shall classify all pages of the 7 document with the same designation unless otherwise indicated by the Designating Party. Marking 8 or stamping “Confidential Information” or “Attorneys Eyes Only Material” on a label on any 9 electronic storage medium shall designate the entire contents of such electronic storage medium as 10 Confidential Information or Attorneys Eyes Only Material. 11 12 Access to Confidential Information And Attorneys Eyes Only Material 5. Confidential Information produced or received in this action subject to this protective 13 order shall not be disclosed by any person who has received such Confidential Information through 14 this action except to: the Court, including assigned judges, their staff, jurors and other court 15 personnel; court reporters and videographers recording or transcribing testimony in this action; 16 attorneys of record for the parties and their respective associates, paralegals, clerks, and employees 17 involved in the conduct of this litigation and in-house attorneys at Defendant. Notwithstanding the 18 foregoing, the following designated persons may also receive and review Confidential Information: 19 (a) Plaintiffs Robert Bankwitz, William Jacobo, and Joshua Hernandez; 20 (b) Any person who was involved in the preparation of the document, materials or the 21 discovery responses containing Confidential Information or who lawfully received or reviewed the 22 documents or to whom the Confidential Information has previously been made available other than 23 by one receiving such Confidential Information in connection with this action; 24 25 (c) Experts or consultants who are engaged by counsel for any party to perform investigative work, factual research, or other services relating to this action; 26 (d) Mediators used to try to resolve the action; 27 (e) Any other person with the prior written consent of the designating party. 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 3. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 6. Attorneys Eyes Only Material produced or received in this action subject to this 2 protective order shall not be disclosed, revealed or disseminated by any person who has received 3 such Confidential Information through this action except to: the Court, including assigned judges, 4 their staff, jurors and other court personnel; court reporters and videographers recording or 5 transcribing testimony in this action; attorneys of record for the parties and their respective 6 associates, paralegals, clerks, and employees involved in the conduct of this litigation and in-house 7 attorneys at Defendant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following designated persons may also 8 review Attorneys Eyes Only Material: 9 10 11 (a) Experts or consultants who are engaged by counsel for any party to perform investigative work, factual research, or other services relating to this action; (b) Any person who was involved in the preparation of the document, materials or the 12 discovery responses containing Attorneys Eyes Only Material, as well as any person indicated on the 13 face of the document to be its originator, author or a recipient of a copy thereof. 14 (c) Mediators used to try to resolve the action; 15 (d) Any other person with the prior written consent of the designating party. 16 7. Prior to reviewing any Confidential Information, any person who falls within a 17 category identified in Paragraph 5(a)-(e) shall be provided a copy of this protective order and shall 18 agree to be bound by its terms by executing the non-disclosure agreement in the form set forth in 19 Attachment A. Prior to reviewing any Attorneys Eyes Only Material, any person who falls within a 20 category identified in Paragraph 6(a)-(d) shall be provided a copy of this protective order and shall 21 agree to be bound by its terms by executing the non-disclosure agreement in the form set forth in 22 Attachment B. 23 8. The parties shall retain copies of any executed non-disclosure agreements until the 24 end of the action. In the event of a possible violation of this protective order while this action is 25 pending, a party may request that the Court order production of the executed non-disclosure 26 agreements for good cause. Otherwise, the non-disclosure agreements are confidential and are not 27 subject to any discovery request while the action is pending. No more than thirty (30) calendar days 28 after the end of litigation in the action, the party who received the Confidential Information and/or LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 4. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 Attorneys Eyes Only Material shall provide copies of all executed non-disclosure agreements to the 2 party who produced the Confidential Information and/or Attorneys Eyes Only Material. 3 9. The action is at an end when all of the following that are applicable occur: (a) a final 4 judgment has been entered by the Court or the case has otherwise been dismissed with prejudice; 5 (b) the time for any objection to or request for reconsideration of such a judgment or dismissal has 6 expired; (c) all available appeals have concluded or the time for such appeals has expired; and 7 (d) any post appeal proceedings have concluded. 8 9 Use Of Confidential Information And Attorneys Eyes Only Material 10. Either party shall use Confidential Information and Attorneys Eyes Only Material 10 solely and exclusively for preparing for, prosecuting, and/or defending this case, including any 11 claims on behalf of the named Plaintiffs and any putative class members pending the completion of 12 the judicial process, including appeal. Confidential Information and Attorneys Eyes Only Material 13 cannot be used for any other purpose in any other matter or proceeding for any reason whatsoever. 14 11. Nothing in this protective order shall restrict any party’s counsel from giving advice 15 to its client with respect to this action and, in the course thereof, relying upon Confidential 16 Information and/or Attorneys Eyes Only Material, provided that in giving such advice, counsel shall 17 not disclose the other party’s Confidential Information and/or Attorneys Eyes Only Material other 18 than in a manner expressly provided for in this protective order. 19 12. Testimony taken at a deposition that involves Confidential Information or Attorneys 20 Eyes Only Material must be designated as “Confidential” or “Attorneys Eyes Only Material” by 21 making a statement to that effect on the record at the deposition, identifying the specific testimony or 22 items claimed to be Confidential Information or Attorneys Eyes Only Material. Arrangements shall 23 be made with the deposition reporter taking and transcribing information designated as Confidential 24 and/or Attorneys Eyes Only Material to bind separately such portions of the deposition transcript, 25 and/or to label such portions appropriately. If a party intends to file with the Court any portions of 26 the deposition transcript and/or video or audio versions of the depositions that contain Confidential 27 Information or Attorneys Eyes Only Material, or references thereto, such portions must be filed 28 under seal. This application to file under seal must show good cause for the under seal filing. The LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 5. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 application shall be directed to the judge to whom the papers are directed. Pending the ruling on the 2 application, the papers or portions thereof subject to the sealing application shall not be filed with 3 the Court. Documents and information the Court authorizes to be filed under seal shall be filed in 4 paper form (not filed electronically), as specified in the Court’s CM/ECF Procedures. 5 13. In the event that the Court denies the application to file under seal, the Parties shall 6 redact all confidential and/or proprietary and/or private information, including all personally 7 identifiable information, prior to filing. See ¶ 37 below. 8 14. A copy of the protective order shall be attached as an exhibit to the deposition 9 transcript and the court reporter shall be subject to the protective order and precluded from providing 10 the original or copies of the deposition transcript or portions thereof, any copies thereof, or portions 11 of copies thereof, to any persons or entities other than counsel of record in the action. Any audiotape 12 and/or videotape of said deposition shall also be subject to this protective order. The deposition 13 videographer shall be subject to this protective order and precluded from providing the original 14 deposition videotape or portions of the videotape to any persons or entities other than counsel of 15 record. 16 precluded from providing the original deposition audiotape or portions of the audiotape, to any 17 persons or entities other than counsel of record in the action. 18 Any audiotape shall also be subject to this protective order and all persons shall be 15. Only individuals permitted access to Confidential Information or Attorneys Eyes 19 Only Material shall attend any deposition where Confidential Information or Attorneys Eyes Only 20 Material is used. However, where feasible, an individual who is not allowed access to Attorneys 21 Eyes Only Material may attend portions of the deposition where Attorneys Eyes Only Material is not 22 used or discussed. 23 Attorneys Eyes Only Material shall not disclose to any person any statements made by deponents at 24 depositions that reference Confidential Information or Attorneys Eyes Only Material unless that 25 person is independently allowed access to the information. Nothing in this protective order gives 26 any individual the right to attend a deposition that they would not otherwise be entitled to attend. Individuals attending any depositions using Confidential Information or 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 6. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 2 No Waiver And Challenges to Designation 16. Whether or not any evidence or testimony is, in fact, designated as “Confidential” or 3 “Attorneys Eyes Only” shall not be conclusive of whether it is lawfully entitled to trade secret or 4 other confidentiality protections, and the failure to make such a designation shall not constitute a 5 waiver of any such protections. 6 17. By entering into this protective order, the parties do not waive any right to challenge 7 whether any material designated or not designated as Confidential Information or Attorneys Eyes 8 Only Material is properly designated or not designated as such, and do not waive the right to 9 challenge at any hearing, trial or other proceeding whether such information is, in fact, confidential 10 or private. 11 18. 12 13 To the extent a party wishes to object to the designation of evidence or testimony as Confidential Information or Attorneys Eyes Only Material, the following procedures apply: (a) Any party may in good faith object to the designation of any evidence or testimony as 14 Confidential Information or Attorneys Eyes Only Material or to the limitations as to the use and 15 disclosure of such information, by providing written notice of such objections to the Designating 16 Party. The grounds for any objections shall be stated with reasonable particularity. 17 (b) The parties shall thereafter attempt to resolve such dispute in good faith on an 18 informal basis. If the dispute cannot be resolved within fourteen (14) days after the objection is 19 served, the party challenging the designation may apply to the Court, pursuant to applicable rules of 20 court, for an order permitting the use and dissemination of the challenged document(s) outside the 21 conditions set forth herein relating to Confidential and Attorneys Eyes Only Material. 22 challenged documents shall be treated as confidential until such time as the Court has ruled on the 23 motion. 24 25 The Filing Under Seal And Handling At Hearings And Trial 19. With regard to any Confidential Information or Attorneys Eyes Only Material to be 26 filed with the Court, such documents must be filed under seal. This application to file under seal 27 must show good cause for the under seal filing. The application shall be directed to the judge to 28 whom the papers are directed. Pending the ruling on the application, the papers or portions thereof LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 7. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 that document if, within fourteen (14) days of discovering the inadvertent disclosure of the protected 2 material, the producing party provides written notice to the receiving party (a) identifying the 3 material or information inadvertently produced, (b) stating the privilege asserted, (c) and requesting 4 its return by the receiving party. 5 25. Upon written notice of an unintentional production by the producing party, the 6 receiving party must promptly return all hard and soft copies of the specified document(s). Where 7 the document(s) have been transferred or stored electronically or are themselves privileged or 8 attorney work product protected, the receiving party must delete the documents from the devices on 9 which they are or were stored or accessed or otherwise make them inaccessible to the receiving 10 11 party. 26. The receiving party shall have seven (7) days from receipt of notification of the 12 inadvertent production to determine in good faith whether to contest such claim and to notify the 13 producing party in writing of an objection to the claim of privilege and the grounds for that 14 objection. 15 27. If any document produced by another party is on its face subject to a legally 16 recognizable privilege or evidentiary protection, the receiving party shall: (a) refrain from reading 17 the document any more closely than is necessary to ascertain that it is privileged or protected; 18 (b) immediately notify the producing party in writing that it has discovered documents believed to be 19 privileged or protected; (c) specifically identify the documents by Bates number range or other 20 identifying information; and (d) return all hard and soft copies of the documents and, where the 21 documents have been transferred or stored electronically, delete the documents from the devices on 22 which they are or were stored or accessed or otherwise make them inaccessible. The steps in this 23 paragraph shall be completed within seven (7) days of discovery by the receiving party. The 24 producing party shall preserve all document(s) returned under this paragraph until it confirms that 25 there is no dispute about the privileged and/or work product nature of the document(s) or, if there is 26 a dispute, until the privilege issue is resolved. Notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph, the 27 receiving party is under no obligation to search or review the producing party’s documents to 28 identify potentially privileged or work product protected documents. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 9. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 28. The inadvertent production of any document in this action shall be without prejudice 2 to any claim that such material is protected by any legally cognizable privilege or evidentiary 3 protection including but not limited to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work product 4 doctrine, and no party shall be held to have waived any rights by such inadvertent production 5 provided that they comply with the terms of this protective order for designating the material as 6 privileged and requesting its return. 7 29. To the extent that the information contained in a document subject to a claim has 8 already been used in or described in other documents generated or maintained by the receiving party, 9 then the receiving party must delete and/or render inaccessible those portions of the document that 10 refer to the privileged and/or work product information. 11 specified document(s) before being notified of its inadvertent production, it must take reasonable 12 steps to retrieve the document(s). 13 30. If the receiving party disclosed the The receiving party’s return or destruction of such privileged or protected documents 14 as provided herein will not act as a waiver of the requesting party’s right to move for the production 15 of the returned or destroyed documents on the grounds that the documents are not in fact subject to a 16 viable claim of privilege or protection. However, the receiving party is prohibited and estopped 17 from arguing that the production of the documents in this matter acts as a waiver of an applicable 18 privilege or evidentiary protection, that the disclosure of the documents was not inadvertent, that the 19 producing party did not take reasonable steps to prevent the disclosure of the privileged documents 20 or that the producing party failed to take reasonable steps to rectify the error provided that they 21 comply with the terms of this protective order for designating the material as privileged and 22 requesting its return. 23 31. The parties shall meet and confer within fourteen (14) days from the receipt of the 24 receiving party’s objection notice in an effort to resolve the dispute by agreement. If an agreement is 25 not reached, the receiving party may file an appropriate motion and, as part of that motion, request 26 that the producing party submit the specified documents to the Court under seal for a determination 27 of the claim and provide the Court with the grounds for the asserted privilege or protection except 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 10. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 where such a submission would violate existing law. Any party may request expedited treatment of 2 any request for the Court's determination of the claim. 3 4 5 6 Termination Of Case 32. The terms of this protective order shall survive the final termination of this action and shall be binding on all of the parties thereafter. 33. Within thirty (30) business days of the termination or settlement of this action, each 7 party must return Confidential Information or Attorneys Eyes Only Material received during this 8 litigation from the other party and copies of any deposition transcripts designated as Confidential 9 Information or Attorneys Eyes Only Material. Where Confidential Information or Attorneys Eyes 10 Only Material has been transferred or stored electronically, the receiving party must delete the 11 electronic versions from the devices on which they are or were stored or accessed or otherwise make 12 them inaccessible to the receiving party. Notwithstanding these provisions, that counsel of record 13 for the parties may keep, in strictest confidence, those copies of any part of the Confidential 14 Information or Attorneys Eyes Only Material that have become part of the official record of this 15 litigation and may retain abstracts or summaries of such materials, which contain counsel’s mental 16 impressions or opinions. Such information shall remain subject to the terms of this protective order. 17 34. Upon returning to the other side all Confidential Information or Attorneys Eyes Only 18 Material and/or deposition testimony, the returning party must also execute and furnish the 19 Certificate of Surrender and Deletion of Confidential Information and Attorneys Eyes Only Material 20 Agreement in the form set forth in Attachment C. 21 22 Miscellaneous Provisions 35. The parties expressly agree that, by entering into this protective order, they do not 23 waive any objections to any discovery requests and, further, that they do not agree to the production 24 of any information or documents, or type or category of information or documents. 25 36. This protective order is subject to modification by stipulation of the parties. The 26 Court may modify the terms and conditions of this protective order for good cause, or in the interest 27 of justice, or on its own order at any time in these proceedings. The parties request that the Court 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 11. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 provide them with notice of the Court's intent to modify the protective order and the content of those 2 modifications, prior to making such modifications. 3 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: May 2, 2018 5 6 s/ Alejandro P. Gutierrez (with consent) ALEJANDRO P. GUTIERREZ HATHAWAY, PERRETT, WEBSTER, POWERS, CHRISMAN & GUTIERREZ A Professional Corporation 7 8 9 MICHAEL A. STRAUSS, Bar No. 246718 mike@strausslawyers.com STRAUSS & STRAUSS, APC 121 North Fir Street, Suite F Ventura, CA 93001 Tel: 805.641.6600│Fax: 805.641.6607 10 11 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ROBERT BANKWITZ, WILLIAM JACOBO, and JOSHUA HERNANDEZ 14 15 16 Dated: May 2, 2018 17 /s/ Jody A. Landry JODY A. LANDRY LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant ECOLAB INC. 18 19 20 JOHN A. YBARRA, Pro Hac Vice jybarra@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 321 North Clark Street, Suite 1000 Chicago, Illinois 60654 Telephone: 312.372.5520 Facsimile: 312. 372.7880 21 22 23 24 Attorneys for Defendant ECOLAB INC. 25 26 27 Firmwide:154156250.1 057118.1196 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 12. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 ORDER Upon review of the parties’ Stipulation for Protective Order and upon a finding of good 3 cause, it is hereby ordered that the foregoing Stipulated Protective Order is approved and the parties 4 are ordered to act in compliance therewith. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 R NIA FO LI . Chen dward M ER C DISTRICT JUDGE N F D IS T IC T O R H 8 9 UNIT ED RT 7 Judge E A 5/16 Dated: _______________, 2018 ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO NO 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 5 S 2 EDWARD M. CHEN ADDED BY COURT: 37. Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public record in this action any material designated Confidential or Attorneys Eyes Only. A Party that seeks to file such material under seal must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Such material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific material at issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, a sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing that the material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a party's request to file such material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) is denied by the court, then the party may file the information in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) unless otherwise instructed by the court. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 ATTACHMENT A 2 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 3 The undersigned hereby agrees that: 4 1. I have reviewed the protective order in this action. 5 2. I agree that I am one of the following: (a) a named plaintiff to the action; (b) a person 6 who was involved in the preparation of the document, materials or the discovery responses 7 containing Confidential Information or who lawfully received or reviewed the documents or to 8 whom the Confidential Information has previously been made available other than by receipt of such 9 Confidential Information in connection with this action; (c) an expert or consultant who has been 10 engaged by counsel for any party to perform investigative work, factual research, or other services 11 relating to this action; (d) a mediator used to try to resolve the action; or (e) a person who the parties 12 to the action have agreed in writing may receive Confidential Information. 13 3. I agree not to disclose any of the Confidential Information to any third person and 14 further agree that my use of any Confidential Information shall only be for the prosecution, defenses, 15 discovery, mediation and/or settlement of this action, and not for any other purpose. 4. 16 I further agree that on or before the termination or settlement of this action, I will 17 return all Confidential Information which is in my possession, custody, or control to the attorneys 18 involved in the action so that it can be returned as provided in the protective order. 19 5. By signing this Confidential Information Non-Disclosure Agreement, I stipulate to 20 the jurisdiction of this Court to enforce the terms of this Agreement. 21 Dated: 22 Print Name: Sign Name: 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 ATTACHMENT B 2 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY MATERIAL 3 NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 4 The undersigned hereby agrees that: 5 1. I have reviewed the protective order in this action. 6 2. I agree that I am one of the following: (a) an expert or consultant who has been 7 engaged by counsel for any party to perform investigative work, factual research, or other services 8 relating to this action; (b) a person who was involved in the preparation of the document, materials 9 or the discovery responses containing Attorneys Eyes Only Material or a person indicated on the 10 face of the document to be its originator, author or a recipient of a copy thereof; (c) a mediator used 11 to try to resolve the action; or (d) a person who the parties to the action have agreed in writing may 12 receive Confidential Information and/or Attorneys Eyes Only Material. 13 3. I agree not to disclose any Confidential Information and/or Attorneys Eyes Only 14 Material to any third person and further agree that my use of any Confidential Information and/or 15 Attorneys Eyes Only Material shall only be for the prosecution, defenses, discovery, mediation 16 and/or settlement of this action, and not for any other purpose. 4. 17 I further agree that on or before the termination or settlement of this action, I will 18 return all Confidential Information and/or Attorneys Eyes Only Material which is in my possession, 19 custody, or control to the attorneys involved in the action so that it can be returned as provided in the 20 protective order. 21 5. 22 By signing this Attorneys Eyes Only Material Non-Disclosure Agreement, I stipulate to the jurisdiction of this Court to enforce the terms of this Agreement. 23 24 Dated: Print Name: Sign Name: 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 15. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 ATTACHMENT C 2 CERTIFICATE OF SURRENDER AND DELETION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 3 AND/OR ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY MATERIAL 4 The undersigned hereby represents that, pursuant to the protective order, all Confidential 5 Information and/or Attorneys Eyes Only Material within the possession, custody or control of the 6 undersigned has been returned to the producing party to the extent it could be returned either in hard 7 or soft copy. The undersigned further represents that, pursuant to the protective order, and to the 8 extent Confidential Information or Attorneys Eyes Only Material was transferred or stored 9 electronically, all electronic versions of the material and information have been deleted from the 10 devices on which they were stored or accessed or otherwise rendered inaccessible. 11 12 Dated: 13 Print Name: Sign Name: 14 15 16 Firmwide:154156250.1 057118.1196 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 16. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?