Bankwitz et al v. Ecolab, Inc.,

Filing 60

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 59 setting Motion to Reconsideration for 8/2/18 at 2:30 p.m. filed by Ecolab, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/11/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JOHN A. YBARRA, Pro Hac Vice jybarra@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 321 North Clark Street, Suite 1000 Chicago, Illinois 60654 Telephone: 312.372.5520 Facsimile: 312. 372.7880 JODY A. LANDRY, Bar No. 125743 jlandry@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway, Suite 900 San Diego, California 92101.3577 Telephone: 619.232.0441 Facsimile: 619.232.4302 Attorneys for Defendant ECOLAB INC. 10 11 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS LISTED ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 ROBERT BANKWITZ, an individual, WILLIAM JACOBO, an individual, JOSHUA HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of themselves and other persons similarly situated, 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiffs, v. ECOLAB, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 JOINT STIPULATION RE BRIEFING/HEARING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Case No. 3:17-cv-02924-EMC JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ECOLAB INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OF NON-PAGA CLAIMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Alejandro P. Gutierrez HATHAWAY, PERRETT, WEBSTER POWERS, CHRISMAN & GUTIERREZ 5450 Telegraph Road, Suite 200 Ventura, CA 93006 Email: agutierrez@hathawaylawfirm.com Telephone: (805) 644-7111 Facsimile: (805) 644-8296 Daniel J. Palay Brian D. Hefelfinger PALAY HEFELFINGER, APC 1484 E. Main Street, Suite 105-B Ventura, CA 93001 Email:djp@calemploymentcounsel.com Telephone: (805) 628-8220 Facsimile: (805) 765-8600 Michael A. Strauss Aris Karakalos STRAUSS & STRAUSS, APC 121 N. Fir Street, Suite F Ventura, CA 93001 Email: mike@strausslawyers.com Telephone: (805) 641-6600 Facsimile: (805) 641-6607 17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 JOINT STIPULATION RE BRIEFING/HEARING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 2. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC 1 It is hereby stipulated between the parties to this matter as follows with respect to the briefing 2 schedule and hearing on Docket Entry Number 52, which is Defendant Ecolab Inc.’s request that this 3 court allow it to file a motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order denying its motion to compel 4 arbitration set out in Docket Entry Number 35. 5 1. Docket Entry Number 52 will be considered Defendant Ecolab Inc.’s opening brief with 6 respect to its request that this Court reconsider its order in Docket Entry Number 35 denying the 7 motion to compel arbitration of Plaintiffs’ non-PAGA claims. 8 2. Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion for reconsideration must be filed by July 19, 2018. 9 3. Defendant’s reply brief must be filed by July 26, 2018. 10 4. Defendant’s notice of non-opposition, Docket Entry 58, is deemed withdrawn. 11 5. The hearing on the motion will be on August 2, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. in conjunction with the 12 13 14 already pending motion to compel arbitration of Plaintiffs’ PAGA claims. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: July 5, 2018 15 s/ Brian D. Hefelfinger [with approval] DANIEL J. PALAY 16 BRIAN D. HEFELFINGER 17 PALAY HEFELFINGER APC Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18 19 20 Dated: July 5, 2018 21 en ER FO d M. Ch dwar Judge E H LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 RT 28 Firmwide:155685274.1 057118.1196 NO 27 ERED LI 26 O ORD IT IS S A 25 UNIT ED 24 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 23 s/ Jody A. Landry JODY A. LANDRY LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant ECOLAB INC. R NIA 22 N F D IS T IC T O R C JOINT STIPULATION RE BRIEFING/HEARING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 3. Case No. 3-17-cv-02924-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?