United Association of Journeyman and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry, Underground Utility/Landscape Local Union No. 355 et al v. Maniglia Landscape, Inc. et al

Filing 188

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. As set forth in the attached, the court orders the plaintiffs to show cause (1) why they did not meet and confer with the District Council as the court ordered and (2) why the District Council's renewed motion to strike p laintiff Miguel Iniguez's deposition errata sheet, ECF No. 185 , should not be granted. The plaintiffs are ordered to file a written response of not more than five double-spaced pages by May 13, 2019. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on May 8, 2019. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2019)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

San Francisco Division

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

UNITED ASSOCIATION OF
JOURNEYMAN AND APPRENTICES OF
THE PLUMBING AND PIPE FITTING
INDUSTRY, UNDERGROUND
UTILITY/LANDSCAPE LOCAL UNION
NO. 355, et al.,

12
13
14

Plaintiffs,
15
v.
16

Case No. 17-cv-03037-RS (LB)
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THEY DID NOT MEET
AND CONFER AND WHY THE
MOTION TO STRIKE DEPOSITION
ERRATA SHEET SHOULD NOT BE
GRANTED
Re: ECF No. 185

MANIGLIA LANDSCAPE, INC., et al.,

17

Defendants.
18
19

On April 5, 2019, defendant Northern California District Council of Laborers filed a motion to

20

strike plaintiff Miguel Iniguez’s errata sheet to his deposition.1 On April 8, 2019, the court denied

21

the District Council’s motion without prejudice and directed the parties to meet and confer per the

22

procedures set out in the court’s standing order.2 On April 9, 2019, counsel for the District Council

23

sent a letter to counsel for the plaintiffs requesting a meet and confer and proposing dates for a

24
25
26
27

Dist. Council Mot. to Strike – ECF No. 178. Citations refer to material in the Electronic Case File
(“ECF”); pinpoint citations are to the ECF-generated page numbers at the top of documents.
1

2

Order – ECF No. 183.

28
ORDER – No. 17-cv-03037-RS (LB)

1

meeting.3 Counsel for the plaintiffs did not respond.4 On April 25, 2019, counsel for the District

2

Council sent a second letter to counsel for the plaintiffs requesting a meet and confer and

3

proposing additional dates for a meeting.5 Counsel for the plaintiffs did not respond.6 On May 7,

4

2019, the District Council filed a renewed motion to strike Mr. Iniguez’s deposition errata sheet.7
The court hereby orders the plaintiffs to show cause (1) why they did not meet and confer with

5
6

the District Council as the court ordered and (2) why the District Council’s renewed motion to

7

strike Mr. Iniguez’s deposition errata sheet should not be granted. The plaintiffs are ordered to file

8

a written response of not more than five double-spaced pages by May 13, 2019.

9
IT IS SO ORDERED.

11

United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

Dated: May 8, 2019
______________________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
3

Lozano-Batista Decl. – ECF No. 186 at 2 (¶ 2); Lozano-Batista Decl. Ex. A – ECF No. 186-1.

4

Lozano-Batista Decl. – ECF No. 186 at 2 (¶ 3).

5

Id. (¶ 4); Lozano-Batista Decl. Ex. A – ECF No. 186-2.

27

6

Lozano-Batista Decl. – ECF No. 186 at 2 (¶ 5).

28

7

Dist. Council Renewed Mot. to Strike – ECF No. 185.

25
26

ORDER – No. 17-cv-03037-RS (LB)

2