Wainwright v. Bluestem Brands, Inc.

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 17 STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Selecting Mediation by Bluestem Brands, Inc. and Suisun Wainwright filed by Bluestem Brands, Inc.. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 20, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Suisun Wainwright CASE No C 3:17-cv-03041-JST Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Bluestem Brands d/b/a Fingerhut Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) ■ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) Private ADR (specify process and provider) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) ■ other requested deadline: 30 days after close of discovery Date: August 23, 2017 Date: August 23, 2017 Rachel R. Stevens Attorney for Plaintiff Chelsea L. Diaz Attorney for Defendant IT IS SO ORDERED XX IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Mediation completion deadline is May 30, 2018 Date: September 20, 2017 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?