Wainwright v. Bluestem Brands, Inc.
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 17 STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Selecting Mediation by Bluestem Brands, Inc. and Suisun Wainwright filed by Bluestem Brands, Inc.. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 20, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Suisun Wainwright
CASE No C 3:17-cv-03041-JST
Plaintiff(s)
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Bluestem Brands d/b/a Fingerhut
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
■
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
■
other requested deadline: 30 days after close of discovery
Date: August 23, 2017
Date: August 23, 2017
Rachel R. Stevens
Attorney for Plaintiff
Chelsea L. Diaz
Attorney for Defendant
IT IS SO ORDERED
XX IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
Mediation completion deadline is May 30, 2018
Date: September 20, 2017
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Private ADR.”
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?