Brian H. et. al. v. Blue Shield of California
Filing
61
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 03/05/2018. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2018)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
BRIAN H., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
v.
10
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 17-cv-03095-MMC
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'
MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE
Re: Dkt. No. 50
12
13
Before the Court is defendants’ “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended
14
Complaint, or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike,” filed January 23, 2018, pursuant to
15
Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by which motion
16
defendants seek an order dismissing plaintiffs’ Second and Third Causes of Action.
17
Plaintiffs have filed opposition, to which defendants have replied. The matter came on
18
regularly for hearing on March 2, 2018. Katie J. Spielman appeared on behalf of
19
plaintiffs. Joseph E. Laska and Ketakee R. Kane appeared on behalf of defendants.
20
The Court having considered the parties’ respective written submissions and the
21
arguments of counsel at the hearing, as well as having explored with counsel any
22
potentially viable basis for amendment, the motion is, for the reasons stated on the
23
record at the hearing, hereby GRANTED.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: March 5, 2018
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?