Connell & Associates et al v. White et al
Filing
26
ORDER RELATING CASES by Hon. William Alsup granting 22 Administrative Motion.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
CONNELL & ASSOCIATES et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiffs,
No. C 17-03175 WHA
v.
SHANE CLARIDGE WHITE et al.,
ORDER RELATING CASES
Defendants.
/
15
16
Plaintiffs Connell & Associates, David William Connell Huber, and Omar Gerardo Ortiz
17
Castaneda filed a motion to relate Thomas F. White 1991 Trust v. David William Connell, et al.,
18
No. 17-cv-03177-WHO (William Orrick) to this action. Defendants Shane Claridge White,
19
Yulissa Zulaica, and Jack Teeters oppose.
20
Case No. 17-cv-03177-WHO and Case No. 17-03175 WHA concern substantially the
21
same parties, property, transactions, and events, and it is likely that there will be an unduly
22
burdensome duplication of labor if the cases are conducted before different judges. See Civ.
23
Local Rule 3-12. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ motion to relate is GRANTED, and Case No.17-cv-
24
03177-WHO SHALL BE REASSIGNED to the undersigned judge.
25
The parties are instructed that all future filings are to bear the initials of the newly
26
assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any
27
reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the
28
conference, disclosures and report required by FRCP 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise
ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re- noticed by the
1
moving party before the newly assigned judge. Any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules
2
remain in effect, and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern,
3
except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: July 18, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?