Thomas F. White 1991 Trust v. Connell et al

Filing 16

ORDER RELATING CASES Signed by Judge Alsup on 7/18/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 CONNELL & ASSOCIATES et al., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 Plaintiffs, No. C 17-03175 WHA v. SHANE CLARIDGE WHITE et al., ORDER RELATING CASES Defendants. / 15 16 Plaintiffs Connell & Associates, David William Connell Huber, and Omar Gerardo Ortiz 17 Castaneda filed a motion to relate Thomas F. White 1991 Trust v. David William Connell, et al., 18 No. 17-cv-03177-WHO (William Orrick) to this action. Defendants Shane Claridge White, 19 Yulissa Zulaica, and Jack Teeters oppose. 20 Case No. 17-cv-03177-WHO and Case No. 17-03175 WHA concern substantially the 21 same parties, property, transactions, and events, and it is likely that there will be an unduly 22 burdensome duplication of labor if the cases are conducted before different judges. See Civ. 23 Local Rule 3-12. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ motion to relate is GRANTED, and Case No.17-cv- 24 03177-WHO SHALL BE REASSIGNED to the undersigned judge. 25 The parties are instructed that all future filings are to bear the initials of the newly 26 assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any 27 reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the 28 conference, disclosures and report required by FRCP 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re- noticed by the 1 moving party before the newly assigned judge. Any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules 2 remain in effect, and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, 3 except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: July 18, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?